STATE STATUTES & CODES
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
CALIFORNIA STATUTES AND CODES
SECTIONS 30061-30065
GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 30061-30065
30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF), to receive all amounts allocated to a county for purposes of implementing this chapter. (b) In any fiscal year for which a county receives moneys to be expended for the implementation of this chapter, the county auditor shall allocate the moneys in the county's SLESF, including any interest or other return earned on the investment of those moneys, within 30 days of the deposit of those moneys into the fund, and shall allocate those moneys in accordance with the requirements set forth in this subdivision. However, the auditor shall not transfer those moneys to a recipient agency until the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee certifies receipt of an approved expenditure plan from the governing board of that agency. The moneys shall be allocated as follows: (1) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the county sheriff for county jail construction and operation. In the case of Madera, Napa, and Santa Clara Counties, this allocation shall be made to the county director or chief of corrections. (2) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the district attorney for criminal prosecution. (3) Thirty-nine and seven-tenths percent to the county and the cities within the county, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District, in accordance with the relative population of the cities within the county and the unincorporated area of the county, and the Broadmoor Police Protection District in the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District and the Stallion Springs Community Services District in Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District in Siskiyou County, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District in Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate by the population research unit of the Department of Finance, and as adjusted to provide a grant of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. For a newly incorporated city whose population estimate is not published by the Department of Finance, but that was incorporated prior to July 1 of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made, the city manager, or an appointee of the legislative body, if a city manager is not available, and the county administrative or executive officer shall prepare a joint notification to the Department of Finance and the county auditor with a population estimate reduction of the unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of the newly incorporated city by July 15, or within 15 days after the Budget Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made. No person residing within the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District shall also be counted as residing within the unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or within any city located within those counties. The county auditor shall allocate a grant of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. Moneys allocated to the county pursuant to this subdivision shall be retained in the county SLESF, and moneys allocated to a city pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in an SLESF established in the city treasury. (4) Fifty percent to the county or city and county to implement a comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plan as provided in this paragraph and to the Corrections Standards Authority for administrative purposes. Funding for the Corrections Standards Authority, as determined by the Department of Finance, shall not exceed two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000). For the 2003-04 fiscal year, of the two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000), up to one hundred seventy-six thousand dollars ($176,000) may be used for juvenile facility inspections. The juvenile justice plan shall be developed by the local juvenile justice coordinating council in each county and city and county with the membership described in Section 749.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a plan has been previously approved by the Corrections Standards Authority, the plan shall be reviewed and modified annually by the council. The plan or modified plan shall be approved by the county board of supervisors, and in the case of a city and county, the plan shall also be approved by the mayor. The plan or modified plan shall be submitted to the Corrections Standards Authority by May 1 of each year. (A) Juvenile justice plans shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following components: (i) An assessment of existing law enforcement, probation, education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol, and youth services resources that specifically target at-risk juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families. (ii) An identification and prioritization of the neighborhoods, schools, and other areas in the community that face a significant public safety risk from juvenile crime, such as gang activity, daylight burglary, late-night robbery, vandalism, truancy, controlled substances sales, firearm-related violence, and juvenile substance abuse and alcohol use. (iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides for a continuum of responses to juvenile crime and delinquency and demonstrates a collaborative and integrated approach for implementing a system of swift, certain, and graduated responses for at-risk youth and juvenile offenders. (iv) Programs identified in clause (iii) that are proposed to be funded pursuant to this subparagraph, including the projected amount of funding for each program. (B) Programs proposed to be funded shall satisfy all of the following requirements: (i) Be based on programs and approaches that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and delinquency, including prevention, intervention, suppression, and incapacitation. (ii) Collaborate and integrate services of all the resources set forth in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), to the extent appropriate. (iii) Employ information sharing systems to ensure that county actions are fully coordinated, and designed to provide data for measuring the success of juvenile justice programs and strategies. (iv) Adopt goals related to the outcome measures that shall be used to determine the effectiveness of the local juvenile justice action strategy. (C) The plan shall also identify the specific objectives of the programs proposed for funding and specified outcome measures to determine the effectiveness of the programs and contain an accounting for all program participants, including those who do not complete the programs. Outcome measures of the programs proposed to be funded shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: (i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 100,000 population. (ii) The rate of successful completion of probation. (iii) The rate of successful completion of restitution and court-ordered community service responsibilities. (iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of program participants. (v) Quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program. (D) The Corrections Standards Authority shall review plans or modified plans submitted pursuant to this paragraph within 30 days upon receipt of submitted or resubmitted plans or modified plans. The authority shall approve only those plans or modified plans that fulfill the requirements of this paragraph, and shall advise a submitting county or city and county immediately upon the approval of its plan or modified plan. The authority shall offer, and provide, if requested, technical assistance to any county or city and county that submits a plan or modified plan not in compliance with the requirements of this paragraph. The SLESF shall only allocate funding pursuant to this paragraph upon notification from the authority that a plan or modified plan has been approved. (E) To assess the effectiveness of programs funded pursuant to this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in subparagraph (C), the following periodic reports shall be submitted: (i) Each county or city and county shall report, beginning October 15, 2002, and annually each October 15 thereafter, to the county board of supervisors and the Corrections Standards Authority, in a format specified by the authority, on the programs funded pursuant to this chapter and program outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C). (ii) The Corrections Standards Authority shall compile the local reports and, by March 15, 2003, and annually thereafter, make a report to the Governor and the Legislature on program expenditures within each county and city and county from the appropriation for the purposes of this paragraph, on the outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C) of the programs funded pursuant to this paragraph and the statewide effectiveness of the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans. (c) Subject to subdivision (d), for each fiscal year in which the county, each city, the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the county, each city, and each district specified in this subdivision shall appropriate those moneys in accordance with the following procedures: (1) In the case of the county, the county board of supervisors shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to provide frontline law enforcement services, other than those services specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), in the unincorporated areas of the county, in response to written requests submitted to the board by the county sheriff and the district attorney. Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall specify the frontline law enforcement needs of the requesting entity, and those personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to meet those needs. The board shall, at a public hearing held at a time determined by the board in each year that the Legislature appropriates funds for purposes of this chapter, or within 30 days after a request by a recipient agency for a hearing if the funds have been received by the county from the state prior to that request, consider and determine each submitted request within 60 days of receipt, pursuant to the decision of a majority of a quorum present. The board shall consider these written requests separate and apart from the process applicable to proposed allocations of the county general fund. (2) In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. These written requests shall be acted upon by the city council in the same manner as specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (3) In the case of the Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County, the legislative body of that special district shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that special district. These written requests shall be acted upon by the legislative body in the same manner specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies subsequently alter any previous, valid appropriation by that body, for that same fiscal year, of moneys allocated to the county or city pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b). (e) Effective April 1, 2009, the programs authorized by this chapter shall be funded from the Local Safety and Protection Account in the Transportation Fund authorized by Section 10752.2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Of the amount deposited in the Local Safety and Protection Account in the 2008-09 fiscal year, the Controller shall allocate 23.65 percent for purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (b), and shall allocate 23.65 percent for purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b). These amounts shall be allocated in two installments, one on April 1, 2009 and one on July 1, 2009. (f) In the 2009-10 fiscal year, and every fiscal year thereafter, the Controller shall allocate 21.30 percent of the amount deposited in the Local Safety and Protection Account for purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (b), and shall allocate 21.30 percent for purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b). (g) The Controller shall allocate funds to local jurisdictions for public safety in accordance with this section as annually calculated by the Director of Finance. The Controller shall allocate the amount appropriated for purposes of this chapter in the 2008 Budget Act in three installments, to be paid in September, December, and March. In the 2009-10 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, the Controller shall allocate funds authorized for purposes of this chapter on a quarterly basis, beginning October 1. (h) Funds received pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be expended or encumbered in accordance with this chapter no later than June 30 of the following fiscal year. A local agency that has not met this requirement shall remit unspent SLESF moneys received prior to April 1, 2009, to the Controller for deposit into the General Fund. A local agency that has not met the requirement of this subdivision shall remit unspent SLESF moneys received after April 1, 2009, to the Controller for deposit in the Local Safety and Protection Account. (i) If a county, a city, a city and county, or a qualifying special district does not comply with the requirements of this chapter to receive an SLESF allocation, the Controller shall revert funds that were provided for the noncompliant entity prior to April 1, 2009, to the General Fund. Funds provided for the noncompliant entity after March 1, 2009, shall be reverted to the Local Safety and Protection Account. 30062. (a) Except as required by paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061, moneys allocated from a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) to a recipient entity shall be expended exclusively to provide front line law enforcement services. These moneys shall supplement existing services, and shall not be used to supplant any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by that entity. Moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall be used to supplement and not supplant funding by local agencies for existing services. (b) In the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego only, the district attorney may, in consultation with city attorneys in the county, determine a prorated share of the moneys received by the district attorney pursuant to this section to be allocated to city attorneys in the county in each fiscal year to fund the prosecution by those city attorneys of misdemeanor violations of state law. (c) In no event shall any moneys allocated from the county's SLESF be expended by a recipient agency to fund any of the following: (1) Administrative overhead costs in excess of 0.5 percent of a recipient entity's SLESF allocation for that year. (2) The costs of any capital project or construction project funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 that does not directly support front line law enforcement services. (3) The costs of any capital project or construction project funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061. (d) For purposes of subdivision (c), both of the following shall apply: (1) A "recipient agency" or "recipient entity" is that entity that actually incurs the expenditures of SLESF funds allocated pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061. (2) Administrative overhead costs shall only be charged by the recipient entity, as defined in paragraph (1), up to 0.5 percent of its SLESF allocation. (e) For purposes of this chapter, "front line law enforcement services" and "front line municipal police services" each include antigang, community crime prevention, and juvenile justice programs. 30063. (a) The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) in each county or city is to be expended exclusively as required by this chapter. Moneys in that fund shall not be transferred to, or intermingled with, the moneys in any other fund in the county or city treasury, except that moneys may be transferred from the SLESF to the county's or city's general fund to the extent necessary to facilitate the appropriation and expenditure of those transferred moneys in the manner required by this chapter. (b) Moneys in an SLESF may only be invested in safe and conservative investments in accordance with those standards of prudent investment applicable to the investment of trust moneys. The treasurer of the county and each city shall provide a monthly SLESF investment report to either the police chief or the county sheriff and district attorney, as applicable. (c) Each year, at least 30 days prior to the date of the duly noticed public hearing required pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 30061, the county auditor and city treasurer shall detail and summarize allocations from the county's or city's SLESF, as applicable, in a written, public report filed with the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC), the county board of supervisors, or the city council, as applicable, for the entirety of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and the county sheriff or police chief, as applicable. (d) A summary of the annual reports required in subdivision (c) shall be submitted in a standardized format to be developed by the Controller, in conjunction with the California District Attorney's Association, California Police Chief's Association, California State Sheriff's Association, California Peace Officer's Association, California County Auditor's Association, and California Municipal Treasurer's Association, by each SLEOC to the Controller on or before October 15, 2001, and each year thereafter. The Controller shall make a copy of the summarized reports available to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Legislative Analyst's Office. (e) A county, a city, or a city and county that fails to submit the data required pursuant to subdivision (d) of this section or to report as required pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (E) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall not continue to expend funds allocated pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30061 or interest earned pursuant to subdivision (b) of this section until that data and that report are submitted as required by this chapter. (f) Notwithstanding subdivision (e), if the SLEOC fails to transmit the data to the Controller required pursuant to subdivision (d), the local law enforcement agency may submit its expenditure data directly to the Controller no later than 15 days after the date specified in subdivision (d). If the local law enforcement agency has complied with other requirements in this chapter, it may continue to expend funds allocated and interest earned pursuant to this chapter. 30064. (a) There is in each county a Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC), consisting of five members as follows: (1) One municipal police chief. (2) The county sheriff. (3) The district attorney. (4) The county's executive officer. (5) One city manager. (b) (1) The cities in each county shall organize as a city selection committee for the purposes of appointing a city manager and a municipal police chief to the SLEOC. Each appointment shall be made by not less than a majority of all the cities in the county having not less than a majority of the population of all the cities in the county. For purposes of this paragraph, population figures shall be determined on the basis of the most recent census data developed by the Department of Finance. (2) The SLEOC shall determine whether recipient entities have expended moneys received from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) in compliance with this chapter. For this purpose, the SLEOC shall at least annually review the expenditure of SLESF funds by city police departments, the county sheriff, and the district attorney, and shall make its annual review report available to the public. 30065. In no event shall this chapter be construed to affect in any manner the public safety service allocations required by Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 30051).
SECTION 30061-30065
30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF), to receive all amounts allocated to a county for purposes of implementing this chapter. (b) In any fiscal year for which a county receives moneys to be expended for the implementation of this chapter, the county auditor shall allocate the moneys in the county's SLESF, including any interest or other return earned on the investment of those moneys, within 30 days of the deposit of those moneys into the fund, and shall allocate those moneys in accordance with the requirements set forth in this subdivision. However, the auditor shall not transfer those moneys to a recipient agency until the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee certifies receipt of an approved expenditure plan from the governing board of that agency. The moneys shall be allocated as follows: (1) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the county sheriff for county jail construction and operation. In the case of Madera, Napa, and Santa Clara Counties, this allocation shall be made to the county director or chief of corrections. (2) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the district attorney for criminal prosecution. (3) Thirty-nine and seven-tenths percent to the county and the cities within the county, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District, in accordance with the relative population of the cities within the county and the unincorporated area of the county, and the Broadmoor Police Protection District in the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District and the Stallion Springs Community Services District in Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District in Siskiyou County, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District in Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate by the population research unit of the Department of Finance, and as adjusted to provide a grant of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. For a newly incorporated city whose population estimate is not published by the Department of Finance, but that was incorporated prior to July 1 of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made, the city manager, or an appointee of the legislative body, if a city manager is not available, and the county administrative or executive officer shall prepare a joint notification to the Department of Finance and the county auditor with a population estimate reduction of the unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of the newly incorporated city by July 15, or within 15 days after the Budget Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made. No person residing within the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District shall also be counted as residing within the unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or within any city located within those counties. The county auditor shall allocate a grant of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. Moneys allocated to the county pursuant to this subdivision shall be retained in the county SLESF, and moneys allocated to a city pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in an SLESF established in the city treasury. (4) Fifty percent to the county or city and county to implement a comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plan as provided in this paragraph and to the Corrections Standards Authority for administrative purposes. Funding for the Corrections Standards Authority, as determined by the Department of Finance, shall not exceed two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000). For the 2003-04 fiscal year, of the two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000), up to one hundred seventy-six thousand dollars ($176,000) may be used for juvenile facility inspections. The juvenile justice plan shall be developed by the local juvenile justice coordinating council in each county and city and county with the membership described in Section 749.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a plan has been previously approved by the Corrections Standards Authority, the plan shall be reviewed and modified annually by the council. The plan or modified plan shall be approved by the county board of supervisors, and in the case of a city and county, the plan shall also be approved by the mayor. The plan or modified plan shall be submitted to the Corrections Standards Authority by May 1 of each year. (A) Juvenile justice plans shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following components: (i) An assessment of existing law enforcement, probation, education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol, and youth services resources that specifically target at-risk juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families. (ii) An identification and prioritization of the neighborhoods, schools, and other areas in the community that face a significant public safety risk from juvenile crime, such as gang activity, daylight burglary, late-night robbery, vandalism, truancy, controlled substances sales, firearm-related violence, and juvenile substance abuse and alcohol use. (iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides for a continuum of responses to juvenile crime and delinquency and demonstrates a collaborative and integrated approach for implementing a system of swift, certain, and graduated responses for at-risk youth and juvenile offenders. (iv) Programs identified in clause (iii) that are proposed to be funded pursuant to this subparagraph, including the projected amount of funding for each program. (B) Programs proposed to be funded shall satisfy all of the following requirements: (i) Be based on programs and approaches that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and delinquency, including prevention, intervention, suppression, and incapacitation. (ii) Collaborate and integrate services of all the resources set forth in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), to the extent appropriate. (iii) Employ information sharing systems to ensure that county actions are fully coordinated, and designed to provide data for measuring the success of juvenile justice programs and strategies. (iv) Adopt goals related to the outcome measures that shall be used to determine the effectiveness of the local juvenile justice action strategy. (C) The plan shall also identify the specific objectives of the programs proposed for funding and specified outcome measures to determine the effectiveness of the programs and contain an accounting for all program participants, including those who do not complete the programs. Outcome measures of the programs proposed to be funded shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: (i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 100,000 population. (ii) The rate of successful completion of probation. (iii) The rate of successful completion of restitution and court-ordered community service responsibilities. (iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of program participants. (v) Quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program. (D) The Corrections Standards Authority shall review plans or modified plans submitted pursuant to this paragraph within 30 days upon receipt of submitted or resubmitted plans or modified plans. The authority shall approve only those plans or modified plans that fulfill the requirements of this paragraph, and shall advise a submitting county or city and county immediately upon the approval of its plan or modified plan. The authority shall offer, and provide, if requested, technical assistance to any county or city and county that submits a plan or modified plan not in compliance with the requirements of this paragraph. The SLESF shall only allocate funding pursuant to this paragraph upon notification from the authority that a plan or modified plan has been approved. (E) To assess the effectiveness of programs funded pursuant to this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in subparagraph (C), the following periodic reports shall be submitted: (i) Each county or city and county shall report, beginning October 15, 2002, and annually each October 15 thereafter, to the county board of supervisors and the Corrections Standards Authority, in a format specified by the authority, on the programs funded pursuant to this chapter and program outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C). (ii) The Corrections Standards Authority shall compile the local reports and, by March 15, 2003, and annually thereafter, make a report to the Governor and the Legislature on program expenditures within each county and city and county from the appropriation for the purposes of this paragraph, on the outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C) of the programs funded pursuant to this paragraph and the statewide effectiveness of the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans. (c) Subject to subdivision (d), for each fiscal year in which the county, each city, the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the county, each city, and each district specified in this subdivision shall appropriate those moneys in accordance with the following procedures: (1) In the case of the county, the county board of supervisors shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to provide frontline law enforcement services, other than those services specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), in the unincorporated areas of the county, in response to written requests submitted to the board by the county sheriff and the district attorney. Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall specify the frontline law enforcement needs of the requesting entity, and those personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to meet those needs. The board shall, at a public hearing held at a time determined by the board in each year that the Legislature appropriates funds for purposes of this chapter, or within 30 days after a request by a recipient agency for a hearing if the funds have been received by the county from the state prior to that request, consider and determine each submitted request within 60 days of receipt, pursuant to the decision of a majority of a quorum present. The board shall consider these written requests separate and apart from the process applicable to proposed allocations of the county general fund. (2) In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. These written requests shall be acted upon by the city council in the same manner as specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (3) In the case of the Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County, the legislative body of that special district shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that special district. These written requests shall be acted upon by the legislative body in the same manner specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies subsequently alter any previous, valid appropriation by that body, for that same fiscal year, of moneys allocated to the county or city pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b). (e) Effective April 1, 2009, the programs authorized by this chapter shall be funded from the Local Safety and Protection Account in the Transportation Fund authorized by Section 10752.2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Of the amount deposited in the Local Safety and Protection Account in the 2008-09 fiscal year, the Controller shall allocate 23.65 percent for purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (b), and shall allocate 23.65 percent for purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b). These amounts shall be allocated in two installments, one on April 1, 2009 and one on July 1, 2009. (f) In the 2009-10 fiscal year, and every fiscal year thereafter, the Controller shall allocate 21.30 percent of the amount deposited in the Local Safety and Protection Account for purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (b), and shall allocate 21.30 percent for purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b). (g) The Controller shall allocate funds to local jurisdictions for public safety in accordance with this section as annually calculated by the Director of Finance. The Controller shall allocate the amount appropriated for purposes of this chapter in the 2008 Budget Act in three installments, to be paid in September, December, and March. In the 2009-10 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, the Controller shall allocate funds authorized for purposes of this chapter on a quarterly basis, beginning October 1. (h) Funds received pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be expended or encumbered in accordance with this chapter no later than June 30 of the following fiscal year. A local agency that has not met this requirement shall remit unspent SLESF moneys received prior to April 1, 2009, to the Controller for deposit into the General Fund. A local agency that has not met the requirement of this subdivision shall remit unspent SLESF moneys received after April 1, 2009, to the Controller for deposit in the Local Safety and Protection Account. (i) If a county, a city, a city and county, or a qualifying special district does not comply with the requirements of this chapter to receive an SLESF allocation, the Controller shall revert funds that were provided for the noncompliant entity prior to April 1, 2009, to the General Fund. Funds provided for the noncompliant entity after March 1, 2009, shall be reverted to the Local Safety and Protection Account. 30062. (a) Except as required by paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061, moneys allocated from a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) to a recipient entity shall be expended exclusively to provide front line law enforcement services. These moneys shall supplement existing services, and shall not be used to supplant any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by that entity. Moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall be used to supplement and not supplant funding by local agencies for existing services. (b) In the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego only, the district attorney may, in consultation with city attorneys in the county, determine a prorated share of the moneys received by the district attorney pursuant to this section to be allocated to city attorneys in the county in each fiscal year to fund the prosecution by those city attorneys of misdemeanor violations of state law. (c) In no event shall any moneys allocated from the county's SLESF be expended by a recipient agency to fund any of the following: (1) Administrative overhead costs in excess of 0.5 percent of a recipient entity's SLESF allocation for that year. (2) The costs of any capital project or construction project funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 that does not directly support front line law enforcement services. (3) The costs of any capital project or construction project funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061. (d) For purposes of subdivision (c), both of the following shall apply: (1) A "recipient agency" or "recipient entity" is that entity that actually incurs the expenditures of SLESF funds allocated pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061. (2) Administrative overhead costs shall only be charged by the recipient entity, as defined in paragraph (1), up to 0.5 percent of its SLESF allocation. (e) For purposes of this chapter, "front line law enforcement services" and "front line municipal police services" each include antigang, community crime prevention, and juvenile justice programs. 30063. (a) The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) in each county or city is to be expended exclusively as required by this chapter. Moneys in that fund shall not be transferred to, or intermingled with, the moneys in any other fund in the county or city treasury, except that moneys may be transferred from the SLESF to the county's or city's general fund to the extent necessary to facilitate the appropriation and expenditure of those transferred moneys in the manner required by this chapter. (b) Moneys in an SLESF may only be invested in safe and conservative investments in accordance with those standards of prudent investment applicable to the investment of trust moneys. The treasurer of the county and each city shall provide a monthly SLESF investment report to either the police chief or the county sheriff and district attorney, as applicable. (c) Each year, at least 30 days prior to the date of the duly noticed public hearing required pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 30061, the county auditor and city treasurer shall detail and summarize allocations from the county's or city's SLESF, as applicable, in a written, public report filed with the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC), the county board of supervisors, or the city council, as applicable, for the entirety of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and the county sheriff or police chief, as applicable. (d) A summary of the annual reports required in subdivision (c) shall be submitted in a standardized format to be developed by the Controller, in conjunction with the California District Attorney's Association, California Police Chief's Association, California State Sheriff's Association, California Peace Officer's Association, California County Auditor's Association, and California Municipal Treasurer's Association, by each SLEOC to the Controller on or before October 15, 2001, and each year thereafter. The Controller shall make a copy of the summarized reports available to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Legislative Analyst's Office. (e) A county, a city, or a city and county that fails to submit the data required pursuant to subdivision (d) of this section or to report as required pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (E) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall not continue to expend funds allocated pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30061 or interest earned pursuant to subdivision (b) of this section until that data and that report are submitted as required by this chapter. (f) Notwithstanding subdivision (e), if the SLEOC fails to transmit the data to the Controller required pursuant to subdivision (d), the local law enforcement agency may submit its expenditure data directly to the Controller no later than 15 days after the date specified in subdivision (d). If the local law enforcement agency has complied with other requirements in this chapter, it may continue to expend funds allocated and interest earned pursuant to this chapter. 30064. (a) There is in each county a Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC), consisting of five members as follows: (1) One municipal police chief. (2) The county sheriff. (3) The district attorney. (4) The county's executive officer. (5) One city manager. (b) (1) The cities in each county shall organize as a city selection committee for the purposes of appointing a city manager and a municipal police chief to the SLEOC. Each appointment shall be made by not less than a majority of all the cities in the county having not less than a majority of the population of all the cities in the county. For purposes of this paragraph, population figures shall be determined on the basis of the most recent census data developed by the Department of Finance. (2) The SLEOC shall determine whether recipient entities have expended moneys received from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) in compliance with this chapter. For this purpose, the SLEOC shall at least annually review the expenditure of SLESF funds by city police departments, the county sheriff, and the district attorney, and shall make its annual review report available to the public. 30065. In no event shall this chapter be construed to affect in any manner the public safety service allocations required by Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 30051).
California Forms by Issue
California Court Forms
California Law
CALIFORNIA STATE LAWS
CALIFORNIA STATE
> California Budget
> California Counties
> California Zip Codes
CALIFORNIA TAX
> California Sales Tax
CALIFORNIA LABOR LAWS
CALIFORNIA COURT
> California Rules Of Court
> Small Claims Court - California
CALIFORNIA AGENCIES
California Court Map
Tips