STATE STATUTES & CODES
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
CALIFORNIA STATUTES AND CODES
SECTIONS 10816-10824
WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE
SECTION 10816-10824
10816. The system shall have the following goals: (a) Prompt and accurate verification of eligibility. (b) Accurate computation and timely disbursal of benefits for such public assistance programs. (c) Equitable, timely, and consistent treatment of recipients within each program. (d) Reduction of administrative complexity. (e) Strict enforcement of management and fiscal controls. (f) Collection of management information. 10817. The department shall seek advice and assistance from the State Department of Health Services and counties in the planning and implementation of the system so that efficient, effective, and equitable administration of public assistance programs can be maintained. 10818. The department shall submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by August 1, 1984, a detailed work plan for the implementation of the statewide automated welfare system. The work plan shall include at least the following: (a) A detailed description of the functions to be performed by the system. (b) The sequence of the functions to be assumed by the system, and the dates on which the functions would be assumed. (c) The long-range design goals for California's welfare computer systems. (d) The cost of the equipment and the administrative costs of implementing the system. (e) The impact of such a system on the administration of such public assistance programs. (f) Mechanisms by which the savings resulting from computer systems development can be recouped through reduced welfare administrative costs. (g) A detailed description of how the data will be collected, stored, and disseminated to protect the privacy of individuals to ensure the confidentiality of such data. (h) Recommendations for necessary legislative changes to implement the system. The department shall provide to the counties no later than July 15, 1984, copies of the draft of the detailed work plan. The counties may submit no later than August 15, 1984, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee their comments and recommendations on the detailed work plan. 10819. The department may test the system in several counties prior to actual statewide implementation. Criteria in selecting county test sites may include high dollar error rates for overpayments and payments to ineligibles, high administrative unit costs, size of county, and scope of data-processing activities. The department may delay implementation of the system in counties where not cost effective. If the implementation is delayed in such counties, the counties shall make available their data on a timely basis so that a statewide file on public assistance recipients can be maintained. 10820. To ensure statewide uniformity in program administration, the department shall do the following: (a) Develop and publish an exclusive manual of standards procedures for use by county welfare departments in their daily administration of public assistance programs. (b) Provide a comprehensive training package for the use of the uniform standards manual. (c) Develop standard forms to use with the statewide automated welfare system. 10822. The department shall provide an annual report to the Legislature on March 1, 1985, and March 1 of each year thereafter, on the progress in implementing the system. Such a report shall contain at least the following information: (a) The functions assumed by the system. (b) The effectiveness of the system as measured by dollar error rates. (c) The costs and savings of the system. (d) The fiscal impact of the system on the administration of such public assistance programs. (e) The impact of the system on fraud detection, and reduction in duplicate payments. (f) The responsiveness of the system in meeting recipient's needs. (g) Recommendations for further legislative action. (h) Any revisions in the long-range plan that will affect the objectives to be accomplished in the following year. 10823. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to reduce or otherwise impair the authority of the State Department of Health Services under Sections 10740 and 14100.1 as the single state agency responsible for administration of the medical assistance program. However, the State Department of Social Services shall develop and implement a statewide automated welfare system for the public assistance programs as provided in Section 10815. The department, in developing this system, shall recognize and utilize to the extent feasible, the centralized Medi-Cal eligibility system now maintained by the State Department of Health Services, and shall ensure that the fully implemented system shall meet those Medi-Cal program requirements deemed necessary by the State Department of Health Services. Both departments shall coordinate their efforts to ensure the mutual benefits of the statewide automated welfare system. 10823. (a) (1) The Office of Systems Integration shall implement a statewide automated welfare system for the following public assistance programs: (A) The CalWORKs program. (B) The Food Stamp Program. (C) The Medi-Cal program. (D) The foster care program. (E) The refugee program. (F) County medical services programs. (2) Statewide implementation of the statewide automated welfare system for the programs listed in paragraph (1) shall be achieved through no more than four county consortia, including the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System Consortium, and the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting System. (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the Office of Systems Integration shall migrate the 35 counties that currently use the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System into the C-IV system within the following timeline: (A) Complete Migration System Test and begin User Acceptance Testing on or before June 30, 2009. (B) Complete implementation in at least five counties by February 28, 2010. (C) Complete implementation in at least 14 additional counties on or before May 31, 2010. (D) Complete implementation in all 35 counties on or before August 31, 2010. (E) Decommission the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System on or before January 31, 2011. (b) Nothing in subdivision (a) transfers program policy responsibilities related to the public assistance programs specified in subdivision (a) from the State Department of Social Services or the State Department of Health Services to the Office of Systems Integration. (c) On February 1 of each year, the Office of Systems Integration shall provide an annual report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature on the statewide automated welfare system implemented under this section. The report shall address the progress of state and consortia activities and any significant schedule, budget, or functionality changes in the project. (d) Notwithstanding any other law, the Statewide Automated Welfare System consortia shall have the authority to expend within approved annual state budgets for each system as follows: (1) Make changes within any line item, provided that the change does not create additional project costs in the current or in a future budget year. (2) Make a change of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or 10 percent of the total for the line item from which the funds are derived, whichever is greater, between line items with notice to the Office of Systems Integration, provided that the change does not create additional project costs in the current or in a future budget year. (3) Make requests to the Office of Systems Integration for changes between line items of greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or 10 percent of the total for the line item from which the funds are derived, which do not increase the total cost in the current or a future budget year. The Office of Systems Integration shall take action to approve or deny the request within 10 days. 10823.5. The State Department of Social Services shall pay the county share of Merced County's Merced Automated Global Information Control (MAGIC) application maintenance costs until September 30, 1998, or until Merced County has converted its caseload to one of the Statewide Automated Welfare System (SAWS) consortia systems, whichever occurs first. Merced County shall be the first county implemented under the SAWS consortium system approved for Merced County. Beginning October 1, 1998, Merced County shall pay the county share of MAGIC application maintenance costs based on its percentage share of the total caseload for the consortium approved for Merced County on October 1, 1998. The caseload percentage share shall be adjusted each fiscal year to reflect changes in caseload throughout the consortium. Caseload for the purposes of this section shall be defined as actual average annual duplicated case counts for the most current full fiscal year for the programs included in the consortia system. Beginning October 1, 1998, and until Merced County has converted its caseload to the SAWS consortium approved for Merced County, the department shall pay the difference between the total county share of MAGIC application maintenance costs and the Merced County caseload percentage share of MAGIC application costs. 10824. (a) The counties not participating in the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System Consortium or the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium shall collectively pay 5 percent of the total application development costs of the Statewide Automated Welfare System consortium to which they belong. The proportion of the 5 percent of total application development costs paid by a participating county shall be the same proportion that the county's caseload bears to the total consortium caseload for the fiscal year in which the contract for application development is executed. "Caseload" for purposes of this section, means the actual average annual duplicated case counts for the programs included in each consortia's application. A county subject to this section may pay its proportion of application development costs during development of its consortium's system, or, by agreement with the department, may pay its proportion after its consortium's system in production, but within four years after the start of production in a county. (b) The department shall pay the county share of all other Statewide Automated Welfare System development and implementation costs approved by the Department of Finance and the federal funding agencies for the counties participating in each consortium, except the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium. (c) The department shall pay the county share of maintenance and operations costs for the first 12 months of production of the Statewide Automated Welfare System for the counties participating in each consortium, except the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium. (d) For purposes of this section, "production" means the first conversion of a county case to the Statewide Automated Welfare System application used by the county's consortium, or the first processing of an intake case using the county's Statewide Automated Welfare System consortium application, whichever occurs first. (e) The department shall pay all Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations costs for specified counties as defined in this subdivision. A county qualified for Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations funding is defined as one having an average monthly, duplicated continuing case count below 3,700 cases for the CalWORKs, nonassistance food stamp, public assistance food stamps, Medi-Cal, foster care, refugee, and county medical services programs. The department shall make its determination based on actual case counts for the most current full fiscal year. The department shall provide funding for the county share-of-costs for those counties that annually meet this definition until June 30, 2001. (f) Beginning October 1, 1998, the original 14 Interim Statewide Automated System counties shall pay the county share of Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations costs at the county administrative cost sharing ratios otherwise provided by law. Counties described in subdivision (e) shall not be subject to this requirement. (g) The department shall pay the county share of Napa County's Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System's application maintenance costs through September 30, 1998. Beginning October 1, 1998, Napa County shall pay the county share of the Interim Statewide Welfare System application maintenance costs at the county administrative cost sharing ratios otherwise provided by law. (h) (1) The county shall secure the prior approval of the department for any use of Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software or resources for activities and program administration not eligible for federal financial participation. (2) The county shall allocate Statewide Automated Welfare System costs to the respective programs eligible for federal financial participation in accordance with the cost allocation requirements of each program. (3) The county shall allocate as Statewide Automated Welfare System costs only for activities and program administration eligible for federal financial participation. (i) If a county uses Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software, or resources for activities and program administration not eligible for federal financial participation, and fails to comply with provisions specified in subdivision (h), the county shall be liable to the department for any disallowance due to that use by the county of Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software, or resources. In the event of such a loss, the department may recover the loss by reducing funds otherwise due the county as state participation in programs administered by the county under the supervision of the department. (j) The department shall fund each county's share of the Central Data Base for the Medi-Cal Eligibility Data System until the end of the 12th month after Statewide Automated Welfare System production begins, as defined in subdivision (d).
SECTION 10816-10824
10816. The system shall have the following goals: (a) Prompt and accurate verification of eligibility. (b) Accurate computation and timely disbursal of benefits for such public assistance programs. (c) Equitable, timely, and consistent treatment of recipients within each program. (d) Reduction of administrative complexity. (e) Strict enforcement of management and fiscal controls. (f) Collection of management information. 10817. The department shall seek advice and assistance from the State Department of Health Services and counties in the planning and implementation of the system so that efficient, effective, and equitable administration of public assistance programs can be maintained. 10818. The department shall submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by August 1, 1984, a detailed work plan for the implementation of the statewide automated welfare system. The work plan shall include at least the following: (a) A detailed description of the functions to be performed by the system. (b) The sequence of the functions to be assumed by the system, and the dates on which the functions would be assumed. (c) The long-range design goals for California's welfare computer systems. (d) The cost of the equipment and the administrative costs of implementing the system. (e) The impact of such a system on the administration of such public assistance programs. (f) Mechanisms by which the savings resulting from computer systems development can be recouped through reduced welfare administrative costs. (g) A detailed description of how the data will be collected, stored, and disseminated to protect the privacy of individuals to ensure the confidentiality of such data. (h) Recommendations for necessary legislative changes to implement the system. The department shall provide to the counties no later than July 15, 1984, copies of the draft of the detailed work plan. The counties may submit no later than August 15, 1984, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee their comments and recommendations on the detailed work plan. 10819. The department may test the system in several counties prior to actual statewide implementation. Criteria in selecting county test sites may include high dollar error rates for overpayments and payments to ineligibles, high administrative unit costs, size of county, and scope of data-processing activities. The department may delay implementation of the system in counties where not cost effective. If the implementation is delayed in such counties, the counties shall make available their data on a timely basis so that a statewide file on public assistance recipients can be maintained. 10820. To ensure statewide uniformity in program administration, the department shall do the following: (a) Develop and publish an exclusive manual of standards procedures for use by county welfare departments in their daily administration of public assistance programs. (b) Provide a comprehensive training package for the use of the uniform standards manual. (c) Develop standard forms to use with the statewide automated welfare system. 10822. The department shall provide an annual report to the Legislature on March 1, 1985, and March 1 of each year thereafter, on the progress in implementing the system. Such a report shall contain at least the following information: (a) The functions assumed by the system. (b) The effectiveness of the system as measured by dollar error rates. (c) The costs and savings of the system. (d) The fiscal impact of the system on the administration of such public assistance programs. (e) The impact of the system on fraud detection, and reduction in duplicate payments. (f) The responsiveness of the system in meeting recipient's needs. (g) Recommendations for further legislative action. (h) Any revisions in the long-range plan that will affect the objectives to be accomplished in the following year. 10823. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to reduce or otherwise impair the authority of the State Department of Health Services under Sections 10740 and 14100.1 as the single state agency responsible for administration of the medical assistance program. However, the State Department of Social Services shall develop and implement a statewide automated welfare system for the public assistance programs as provided in Section 10815. The department, in developing this system, shall recognize and utilize to the extent feasible, the centralized Medi-Cal eligibility system now maintained by the State Department of Health Services, and shall ensure that the fully implemented system shall meet those Medi-Cal program requirements deemed necessary by the State Department of Health Services. Both departments shall coordinate their efforts to ensure the mutual benefits of the statewide automated welfare system. 10823. (a) (1) The Office of Systems Integration shall implement a statewide automated welfare system for the following public assistance programs: (A) The CalWORKs program. (B) The Food Stamp Program. (C) The Medi-Cal program. (D) The foster care program. (E) The refugee program. (F) County medical services programs. (2) Statewide implementation of the statewide automated welfare system for the programs listed in paragraph (1) shall be achieved through no more than four county consortia, including the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System Consortium, and the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting System. (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the Office of Systems Integration shall migrate the 35 counties that currently use the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System into the C-IV system within the following timeline: (A) Complete Migration System Test and begin User Acceptance Testing on or before June 30, 2009. (B) Complete implementation in at least five counties by February 28, 2010. (C) Complete implementation in at least 14 additional counties on or before May 31, 2010. (D) Complete implementation in all 35 counties on or before August 31, 2010. (E) Decommission the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System on or before January 31, 2011. (b) Nothing in subdivision (a) transfers program policy responsibilities related to the public assistance programs specified in subdivision (a) from the State Department of Social Services or the State Department of Health Services to the Office of Systems Integration. (c) On February 1 of each year, the Office of Systems Integration shall provide an annual report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature on the statewide automated welfare system implemented under this section. The report shall address the progress of state and consortia activities and any significant schedule, budget, or functionality changes in the project. (d) Notwithstanding any other law, the Statewide Automated Welfare System consortia shall have the authority to expend within approved annual state budgets for each system as follows: (1) Make changes within any line item, provided that the change does not create additional project costs in the current or in a future budget year. (2) Make a change of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or 10 percent of the total for the line item from which the funds are derived, whichever is greater, between line items with notice to the Office of Systems Integration, provided that the change does not create additional project costs in the current or in a future budget year. (3) Make requests to the Office of Systems Integration for changes between line items of greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or 10 percent of the total for the line item from which the funds are derived, which do not increase the total cost in the current or a future budget year. The Office of Systems Integration shall take action to approve or deny the request within 10 days. 10823.5. The State Department of Social Services shall pay the county share of Merced County's Merced Automated Global Information Control (MAGIC) application maintenance costs until September 30, 1998, or until Merced County has converted its caseload to one of the Statewide Automated Welfare System (SAWS) consortia systems, whichever occurs first. Merced County shall be the first county implemented under the SAWS consortium system approved for Merced County. Beginning October 1, 1998, Merced County shall pay the county share of MAGIC application maintenance costs based on its percentage share of the total caseload for the consortium approved for Merced County on October 1, 1998. The caseload percentage share shall be adjusted each fiscal year to reflect changes in caseload throughout the consortium. Caseload for the purposes of this section shall be defined as actual average annual duplicated case counts for the most current full fiscal year for the programs included in the consortia system. Beginning October 1, 1998, and until Merced County has converted its caseload to the SAWS consortium approved for Merced County, the department shall pay the difference between the total county share of MAGIC application maintenance costs and the Merced County caseload percentage share of MAGIC application costs. 10824. (a) The counties not participating in the Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System Consortium or the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium shall collectively pay 5 percent of the total application development costs of the Statewide Automated Welfare System consortium to which they belong. The proportion of the 5 percent of total application development costs paid by a participating county shall be the same proportion that the county's caseload bears to the total consortium caseload for the fiscal year in which the contract for application development is executed. "Caseload" for purposes of this section, means the actual average annual duplicated case counts for the programs included in each consortia's application. A county subject to this section may pay its proportion of application development costs during development of its consortium's system, or, by agreement with the department, may pay its proportion after its consortium's system in production, but within four years after the start of production in a county. (b) The department shall pay the county share of all other Statewide Automated Welfare System development and implementation costs approved by the Department of Finance and the federal funding agencies for the counties participating in each consortium, except the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium. (c) The department shall pay the county share of maintenance and operations costs for the first 12 months of production of the Statewide Automated Welfare System for the counties participating in each consortium, except the Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Consortium. (d) For purposes of this section, "production" means the first conversion of a county case to the Statewide Automated Welfare System application used by the county's consortium, or the first processing of an intake case using the county's Statewide Automated Welfare System consortium application, whichever occurs first. (e) The department shall pay all Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations costs for specified counties as defined in this subdivision. A county qualified for Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations funding is defined as one having an average monthly, duplicated continuing case count below 3,700 cases for the CalWORKs, nonassistance food stamp, public assistance food stamps, Medi-Cal, foster care, refugee, and county medical services programs. The department shall make its determination based on actual case counts for the most current full fiscal year. The department shall provide funding for the county share-of-costs for those counties that annually meet this definition until June 30, 2001. (f) Beginning October 1, 1998, the original 14 Interim Statewide Automated System counties shall pay the county share of Statewide Automated Welfare System maintenance and operations costs at the county administrative cost sharing ratios otherwise provided by law. Counties described in subdivision (e) shall not be subject to this requirement. (g) The department shall pay the county share of Napa County's Interim Statewide Automated Welfare System's application maintenance costs through September 30, 1998. Beginning October 1, 1998, Napa County shall pay the county share of the Interim Statewide Welfare System application maintenance costs at the county administrative cost sharing ratios otherwise provided by law. (h) (1) The county shall secure the prior approval of the department for any use of Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software or resources for activities and program administration not eligible for federal financial participation. (2) The county shall allocate Statewide Automated Welfare System costs to the respective programs eligible for federal financial participation in accordance with the cost allocation requirements of each program. (3) The county shall allocate as Statewide Automated Welfare System costs only for activities and program administration eligible for federal financial participation. (i) If a county uses Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software, or resources for activities and program administration not eligible for federal financial participation, and fails to comply with provisions specified in subdivision (h), the county shall be liable to the department for any disallowance due to that use by the county of Statewide Automated Welfare System equipment, software, or resources. In the event of such a loss, the department may recover the loss by reducing funds otherwise due the county as state participation in programs administered by the county under the supervision of the department. (j) The department shall fund each county's share of the Central Data Base for the Medi-Cal Eligibility Data System until the end of the 12th month after Statewide Automated Welfare System production begins, as defined in subdivision (d).
California Forms by Issue
California Court Forms
California Law
CALIFORNIA STATE LAWS
CALIFORNIA STATE
> California Budget
> California Counties
> California Zip Codes
CALIFORNIA TAX
> California Sales Tax
CALIFORNIA LABOR LAWS
CALIFORNIA COURT
> California Rules Of Court
> Small Claims Court - California
CALIFORNIA AGENCIES
California Court Map
Tips