SECTIONS 360-370 - California Statutes

WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE

SECTION 360-370

360. After receiving and considering the evidence on the proper
disposition of the case, the juvenile court may enter judgment as
follows:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the court finds
that the child is a person described by Section 300 and the parent
has advised the court that the parent is not interested in family
maintenance or family reunification services, it may, in addition to
or in lieu of adjudicating the child a dependent child of the court,
order a legal guardianship, appoint a legal guardian, and issue
letters of guardianship, if the court determines that a guardianship
is in the best interest of the child, provided the parent and the
child agree to the guardianship, unless the child's age or physical,
emotional, or mental condition prevents the child's meaningful
response. The court shall advise the parent and the child that no
reunification services will be provided as a result of the
establishment of a guardianship. The proceeding for the appointment
of a guardian shall be in the juvenile court.
Any application for termination of guardianship shall be filed in
juvenile court in a form as may be developed by the Judicial Council
pursuant to Section 68511 of the Government Code. Sections 366.4 and
388 shall apply to this order of guardianship.
No person shall be appointed a legal guardian under this section
until an assessment as specified in subdivision (g) of Section 361.5
is read and considered by the court and reflected in the minutes of
the court.
On and after the date that the director executes a declaration
pursuant to Section 11217, if the court appoints an approved relative
caregiver as the child's legal guardian, the child has been in the
care of that approved relative for a period of six consecutive months
under a voluntary placement agreement, and the child otherwise meets
the conditions for federal financial participation, the child shall
be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program as provided in Article
4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2. The nonfederally
eligible child placed with an approved relative caregiver who is
appointed as the child's legal guardian shall be eligible for aid
under the state-funded Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in Article
4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) of Chapter 2.
The person responsible for preparing the assessment may be called
and examined by any party to the guardianship proceeding.
(b) If the court finds that the child is a person described by
Section 300, it may, without adjudicating the child a dependent child
of the court, order that services be provided to keep the family
together and place the child and the child's parent or guardian under
the supervision of the social worker for a time period consistent
with Section 301.
(c) If the family subsequently is unable or unwilling to cooperate
with the services being provided, the social worker may file a
petition with the juvenile court pursuant to Section 332 alleging
that a previous petition has been sustained and that disposition
pursuant to subdivision (b) has been ineffective in ameliorating the
situation requiring the child welfare services. Upon hearing the
petition, the court shall order either that the petition shall be
dismissed or that a new disposition hearing shall be held pursuant to
subdivision (d).
(d) If the court finds that the child is a person described by
Section 300, it may order and adjudge the child to be a dependent
child of the court.

361. (a) In all cases in which a minor is adjudged a dependent
child of the court on the ground that the minor is a person described
by Section 300, the court may limit the control to be exercised over
the dependent child by any parent or guardian and shall by its order
clearly and specifically set forth all those limitations. Any
limitation on the right of the parent or guardian to make educational
decisions for the child shall be specifically addressed in the court
order. The limitations may not exceed those necessary to protect the
child. If the court specifically limits the right of the parent or
guardian to make educational decisions for the child, the court shall
at the same time appoint a responsible adult to make educational
decisions for the child until one of the following occurs:
(1) The minor reaches 18 years of age, unless the child chooses
not to make educational decisions for himself or herself, or is
deemed by the court to be incompetent.
(2) Another responsible adult is appointed to make educational
decisions for the minor pursuant to this section.
(3) The right of the parent or guardian to make educational
decisions for the minor is fully restored.
(4) A successor guardian or conservator is appointed.
(5) The child is placed into a planned permanent living
arrangement pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (g) of Section
366.21, Section 366.22, or Section 366.26, at which time the foster
parent, relative caretaker, or nonrelative extended family member as
defined in Section 362.7, has the right to represent the child in
educational matters pursuant to Section 56055 of the Education Code.
An individual who would have a conflict of interest in
representing the child may not be appointed to make educational
decisions. For purposes of this section, "an individual who would
have a conflict of interest," means a person having any interests
that might restrict or bias his or her ability to make educational
decisions, including, but not limited to, those conflicts of interest
prohibited by Section 1126 of the Government Code, and the receipt
of compensation or attorneys' fees for the provision of services
pursuant to this section. A foster parent may not be deemed to have a
conflict of interest solely because he or she receives compensation
for the provision of services pursuant to this section.
If the court is unable to appoint a responsible adult to make
educational decisions for the child and paragraphs (1) to (5),
inclusive, do not apply, and the child has either been referred to
the local educational agency for special education and related
services, or has a valid individualized education program, the court
shall refer the child to the local educational agency for appointment
of a surrogate parent pursuant to Section 7579.5 of the Government
Code.
If the court cannot identify a responsible adult to make
educational decisions for the child, the appointment of a surrogate
parent as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 56050 of the
Education Code is not warranted, and there is no foster parent to
exercise the authority granted by Section 56055 of the Education
Code, the court may, with the input of any interested person, make
educational decisions for the child.
All educational and school placement decisions shall seek to
ensure that the child is in the least restrictive educational
programs and has access to the academic resources, services, and
extracurricular and enrichment activities that are available to all
pupils. In all instances, educational and school placement decisions
shall be based on the best interests of the child.
(b) Subdivision (a) does not limit the ability of a parent to
voluntarily relinquish his or her child to the State Department of
Social Services or to a licensed county adoption agency at any time
while the child is a dependent child of the juvenile court, if the
department or agency is willing to accept the relinquishment.
(c) A dependent child may not be taken from the physical custody
of his or her parents or guardian or guardians with whom the child
resides at the time the petition was initiated, unless the juvenile
court finds clear and convincing evidence of any of the following
circumstances listed in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, and, in an
Indian child custody proceeding, paragraph (6):
(1) There is or would be a substantial danger to the physical
health, safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of
the minor if the minor were returned home, and there are no
reasonable means by which the minor's physical health can be
protected without removing the minor from the minor's parent's or
guardian's physical custody. The fact that a minor has been
adjudicated a dependent child of the court pursuant to subdivision
(e) of Section 300 shall constitute prima facie evidence that the
minor cannot be safely left in the physical custody of the parent or
guardian with whom the minor resided at the time of injury. The court
shall consider, as a reasonable means to protect the minor, the
option of removing an offending parent or guardian from the home. The
court shall also consider, as a reasonable means to protect the
minor, allowing a nonoffending parent or guardian to retain physical
custody as long as that parent or guardian presents a plan acceptable
to the court demonstrating that he or she will be able to protect
the child from future harm.
(2) The parent or guardian of the minor is unwilling to have
physical custody of the minor, and the parent or guardian has been
notified that if the minor remains out of their physical custody for
the period specified in Section 366.26, the minor may be declared
permanently free from their custody and control.
(3) The minor is suffering severe emotional damage, as indicated
by extreme anxiety, depression, withdrawal, or untoward aggressive
behavior toward himself or herself or others, and there are no
reasonable means by which the minor's emotional health may be
protected without removing the minor from the physical custody of his
or her parent or guardian.
(4) The minor or a sibling of the minor has been sexually abused,
or is deemed to be at substantial risk of being sexually abused, by a
parent, guardian, or member of his or her household, or other person
known to his or her parent, and there are no reasonable means by
which the minor can be protected from further sexual abuse or a
substantial risk of sexual abuse without removing the minor from his
or her parent or guardian, or the minor does not wish to return to
his or her parent or guardian.
(5) The minor has been left without any provision for his or her
support, or a parent who has been incarcerated or institutionalized
cannot arrange for the care of the minor, or a relative or other
adult custodian with whom the child has been left by the parent is
unwilling or unable to provide care or support for the child and the
whereabouts of the parent is unknown and reasonable efforts to locate
him or her have been unsuccessful.
(6) In an Indian child custody proceeding, continued custody of
the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in
serious emotional or physical damage to the child, and that finding
is supported by testimony of a "qualified expert witness" as
described in Section 224.6.
(A) Stipulation by the parent, Indian custodian, or the Indian
child's tribe, or failure to object, may waive the requirement of
producing evidence of the likelihood of serious damage only if the
court is satisfied that the party has been fully advised of the
requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et
seq.), and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived them.
(B) Failure to meet non-Indian family and child-rearing community
standards, or the existence of other behavior or conditions that meet
the removal standards of this section, will not support an order for
placement in the absence of the finding in this paragraph.
(d) The court shall make a determination as to whether reasonable
efforts were made to prevent or to eliminate the need for removal of
the minor from his or her home or, if the minor is removed for one of
the reasons stated in paragraph (5) of subdivision (c), whether it
was reasonable under the circumstances not to make any of those
efforts, or, in the case of an Indian child custody proceeding,
whether active efforts as required in Section 361.7 were made and
that these efforts have proved unsuccessful. The court shall state
the facts on which the decision to remove the minor is based.
(e) The court shall make all of the findings required by
subdivision (a) of Section 366 in either of the following
circumstances:
(1) The minor has been taken from the custody of his or her parent
or guardian and has been living in an out-of-home placement pursuant
to Section 319.
(2) The minor has been living in a voluntary out-of-home placement
pursuant to Section 16507.4.

361.1. (a) If a child is removed from the physical custody of a
parent or guardian on the ground that the child may come within the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 300, the child
shall be returned to the physical custody of that parent or guardian
immediately after a finding by the juvenile court that the child is
not a person described in Section 300, but, in any case, not more
than two working days following the date of that finding, unless the
parent or guardian and the agency with custody of the child agree to
a later date for the child's release. Nothing in this section shall
affect a parent or guardian's remedies when a child is not returned
immediately, as those remedies existed prior to enactment of this
section.
(b) The Judicial Council shall adopt a rule of court to ensure
proper notice to a parent or guardian regarding the circumstances and
the timeframe in which a child is required to be released from
custody pursuant to this section.

361.2. (a) When a court orders removal of a child pursuant to
Section 361, the court shall first determine whether there is a
parent of the child, with whom the child was not residing at the time
that the events or conditions arose that brought the child within
the provisions of Section 300, who desires to assume custody of the
child. If that parent requests custody, the court shall place the
child with the parent unless it finds that placement with that parent
would be detrimental to the safety, protection, or physical or
emotional well-being of the child.
(b) If the court places the child with that parent it may do any
of the following:
(1) Order that the parent become legal and physical custodian of
the child. The court may also provide reasonable visitation by the
noncustodial parent. The court shall then terminate its jurisdiction
over the child. The custody order shall continue unless modified by a
subsequent order of the superior court. The order of the juvenile
court shall be filed in any domestic relation proceeding between the
parents.
(2) Order that the parent assume custody subject to the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court and require that a home visit be
conducted within three months. In determining whether to take the
action described in this paragraph, the court shall consider any
concerns that have been raised by the child's current caregiver
regarding the parent. After the social worker conducts the home visit
and files his or her report with the court, the court may then take
the action described in paragraph (1), (3), or this paragraph.
However, nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to imply that
the court is required to take the action described in this paragraph
as a prerequisite to the court taking the action described in either
paragraph (1) or paragraph (3).
(3) Order that the parent assume custody subject to the
supervision of the juvenile court. In that case the court may order
that reunification services be provided to the parent or guardian
from whom the child is being removed, or the court may order that
services be provided solely to the parent who is assuming physical
custody in order to allow that parent to retain later custody without
court supervision, or that services be provided to both parents, in
which case the court shall determine, at review hearings held
pursuant to Section 366, which parent, if either, shall have custody
of the child.
(c) The court shall make a finding either in writing or on the
record of the basis for its determination under subdivisions (a) and
(b).
(d) Part 6 (commencing with Section 7950) of Division 12 of the
Family Code shall apply to the placement of a child pursuant to
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (e).
(e) When the court orders removal pursuant to Section 361, the
court shall order the care, custody, control, and conduct of the
child to be under the supervision of the social worker who may place
the child in any of the following:
(1) The home of a noncustodial parent as described in subdivision
(a).
(2) The approved home of a relative.
(3) The approved home of a nonrelative extended family member as
defined in Section 362.7.
(4) A foster home in which the child has been placed before an
interruption in foster care, if that placement is in the best
interest of the child and space is available.
(5) A suitable licensed community care facility.
(6) With a foster family agency to be placed in a suitable
licensed foster family home or certified family home which has been
certified by the agency as meeting licensing standards.
(7) A home or facility in accordance with the federal Indian Child
Welfare Act.
(8) A child under the age of six years may be placed in a
community care facility licensed as a group home for children, or a
temporary shelter care facility as defined in Section 1530.8 of the
Health and Safety Code, only under any of the following
circumstances:
(A) When a case plan indicates that placement is for purposes of
providing specialized treatment to the child, the case plan specifies
the need for, nature of, and anticipated duration of this treatment,
and the facility meets the applicable regulations adopted under
Section 1530.8 of the Health and Safety Code and standards developed
pursuant to Section 11467.1. The specialized treatment period shall
not exceed 120 days, unless additional time is needed pursuant to the
case plan as documented by the caseworker and approved by the
caseworker's supervisor.
(B) When a case plan indicates that placement is for purposes of
providing family reunification services. In addition, the facility
offers family reunification services that meet the needs of the
individual child and his or her family, permits parents to have
reasonable access to their children 24 hours a day, encourages
extensive parental involvement in meeting the daily needs of their
children, and employs staff trained to provide family reunification
services. In addition, one of the following conditions exists:
(i) The child's parent is also a ward of the court and resides in
the facility.
(ii) The child's parent is participating in a treatment program
affiliated with the facility and the child's placement in the
facility facilitates the coordination and provision of reunification
services.
(iii) Placement in the facility is the only alternative that
permits the parent to have daily 24-hour access to the child in
accordance with the case plan, to participate fully in meeting all of
the daily needs of the child, including feeding and personal
hygiene, and to have access to necessary reunification services.
(f) (1) If the child is taken from the physical custody of the
child's parent or guardian and unless the child is placed with
relatives, the child shall be placed in foster care in the county of
residence of the child's parent or guardian in order to facilitate
reunification of the family.
(2) In the event that there are no appropriate placements
available in the parent's or guardian's county of residence, a
placement may be made in an appropriate place in another county,
preferably a county located adjacent to the parent's or guardian's
community of residence.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as requiring
multiple disruptions of the child's placement corresponding to
frequent changes of residence by the parent or guardian. In
determining whether the child should be moved, the social worker
shall take into consideration the potential harmful effects of
disrupting the placement of the child and the parent's or guardian's
reason for the move.
(4) When it has been determined that it is necessary for a child
to be placed in a county other than the child's parent's or guardian'
s county of residence, the specific reason the out-of-county
placement is necessary shall be documented in the child's case plan.
If the reason the out-of-county placement is necessary is the lack of
resources in the sending county to meet the specific needs of the
child, those specific resource needs shall be documented in the case
plan.
(5) When it has been determined that a child is to be placed
out-of-county either in a group home or with a foster family agency
for subsequent placement in a certified foster family home, and the
sending county is to maintain responsibility for supervision and
visitation of the child, the sending county shall develop a plan of
supervision and visitation that specifies the supervision and
visitation activities to be performed and specifies that the sending
county is responsible for performing those activities. In addition to
the plan of supervision and visitation, the sending county shall
document information regarding any known or suspected dangerous
behavior of the child that indicates the child may pose a safety
concern in the receiving county. Upon implementation of the Child
Welfare Services Case Management System, the plan of supervision and
visitation, as well as information regarding any known or suspected
dangerous behavior of the child, shall be made available to the
receiving county upon placement of the child in the receiving county.
If placement occurs on a weekend or holiday, the information shall
be made available to the receiving county on or before the end of the
next business day.
(6) When it has been determined that a child is to be placed
out-of-county and the sending county plans that the receiving county
shall be responsible for the supervision and visitation of the child,
the sending county shall develop a formal agreement between the
sending and receiving counties. The formal agreement shall specify
the supervision and visitation to be provided the child, and shall
specify that the receiving county is responsible for providing the
supervision and visitation. The formal agreement shall be approved
and signed by the sending and receiving counties prior to placement
of the child in the receiving county. In addition, upon completion of
the case plan, the sending county shall provide a copy of the
completed case plan to the receiving county. The case plan shall
include information regarding any known or suspected dangerous
behavior of the child that indicates the child may pose a safety
concern to the receiving county.
(g) Whenever the social worker must change the placement of the
child and is unable to find a suitable placement within the county
and must place the child outside the county, the placement shall not
be made until he or she has served written notice on the parent or
guardian at least 14 days prior to the placement, unless the child's
health or well-being is endangered by delaying the action or would be
endangered if prior notice were given. The notice shall state the
reasons which require placement outside the county. The parent or
guardian may object to the placement not later than seven days after
receipt of the notice and, upon objection, the court shall hold a
hearing not later than five days after the objection and prior to the
placement. The court shall order out-of-county placement if it finds
that the child's particular needs require placement outside the
county.
(h) Where the court has ordered removal of the child from the
physical custody of his or her parents pursuant to Section 361, the
court shall consider whether the family ties and best interest of the
child will be served by granting visitation rights to the child's
grandparents. The court shall clearly specify those rights to the
social worker.
(i) Where the court has ordered removal of the child from the
physical custody of his or her parents pursuant to Section 361, the
court shall consider whether there are any siblings under the court's
jurisdiction, the nature of the relationship between the child and
his or her siblings, the appropriateness of developing or maintaining
the sibling relationships pursuant to Section 16002, and the impact
of the sibling relationships on the child's placement and planning
for legal permanence.
(j) (1) When an agency has placed a child with a relative
caregiver, a nonrelative extended family member, a licensed foster
family home, or a group home, the agency shall ensure placement of
the child in a home that, to the fullest extent possible, best meets
the day-to-day needs of the child. A home that best meets the
day-to-day needs of the child shall satisfy all of the following
criteria:
(A) The child's caregiver is able to meet the day-to-day health,
safety, and well-being needs of the child.
(B) The child's caregiver is permitted to maintain the least
restrictive and most family-like environment that serves the
day-to-day needs of the child.
(C) The child is permitted to engage in reasonable,
age-appropriate day-to-day activities that promote the most
family-like environment for the foster child.
(2) The foster child's caregiver shall use a reasonable and
prudent parent standard, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 362.04, to determine day-to-day activities that are
age-appropriate to meet the needs of the child. Nothing in this
section shall be construed to permit a child's caregiver to permit
the child to engage in day-to-day activities that carry an
unreasonable risk of harm, or subject the child to abuse or neglect.

361.21. (a) The court shall not order the placement of a minor in
an out-of-state group home, unless the court finds, in its order of
placement, that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1) The out-of-state group home is licensed or certified for the
placement of minors by an agency of the state in which the minor will
be placed.
(2) The out-of-state group home meets the requirements of Section
7911.1 of the Family Code.
(3) In-state facilities or programs have been determined to be
unavailable or inadequate to meet the needs of the minor.
(b) At least every six months, the court shall review each
placement made pursuant to subdivision (a) in order to determine
compliance with that subdivision.
(c) A county shall not be entitled to receive or expend any public
funds for the placement of a minor in an out-of-state group home
unless the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) are met.

361.3. (a) In any case in which a child is removed from the
physical custody of his or her parents pursuant to Section 361,
preferential consideration shall be given to a request by a relative
of the child for placement of the child with the relative. In
determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate, the
county social worker and court shall consider, but shall not be
limited to, consideration of all the following factors:
(1) The best interest of the child, including special physical,
psychological, educational, medical, or emotional needs.
(2) The wishes of the parent, the relative, and child, if
appropriate.
(3) The provisions of Part 6 (commencing with Section 7950) of
Division 12 of the Family Code regarding relative placement.
(4) Placement of siblings and half siblings in the same home, if
that placement is found to be in the best interest of each of the
children as provided in Section 16002.
(5) The good moral character of the relative and any other adult
living in the home, including whether any individual residing in the
home has a prior history of violent criminal acts or has been
responsible for acts of child abuse or neglect.
(6) The nature and duration of the relationship between the child
and the relative, and the relative's desire to care for, and to
provide legal permanency for, the child if reunification is
unsuccessful.
(7) The ability of the relative to do the following:
(A) Provide a safe, secure, and stable environment for the child.
(B) Exercise proper and effective care and control of the child.
(C) Provide a home and the necessities of life for the child.
(D) Protect the child from his or her parents.
(E) Facilitate court-ordered reunification efforts with the
parents.
(F) Facilitate visitation with the child's other relatives.
(G) Facilitate implementation of all elements of the case plan.
(H) Provide legal permanence for the child if reunification fails.
However, any finding made with respect to the factor considered
pursuant to this subparagraph and pursuant to subparagraph (G) shall
not be the sole basis for precluding preferential placement with a
relative.
(I) Arrange for appropriate and safe child care, as necessary.
(8) The safety of the relative's home. For a relative to be
considered appropriate to receive placement of a child under this
section, the relative's home shall first be approved pursuant to the
process and standards described in subdivision (d) of Section 309.
In this regard, the Legislature declares that a physical
disability, such as blindness or deafness, is no bar to the raising
of children, and a county social worker's determination as to the
ability of a disabled relative to exercise care and control should
center upon whether the relative's disability prevents him or her
from exercising care and control. The court shall order the parent to
disclose to the county social worker the names, residences, and any
other known identifying information of any maternal or paternal
relatives of the child. This inquiry shall not be construed, however,
to guarantee that the child will be placed with any person so
identified. The county social worker shall initially contact the
relatives given preferential consideration for placement to determine
if they desire the child to be placed with them. Those desiring
placement shall be assessed according to the factors enumerated in
this subdivision. The county social worker shall document these
efforts in the social study prepared pursuant to Section 358.1. The
court shall authorize the county social worker, while assessing these
relatives for the possibility of placement, to disclose to the
relative, as appropriate, the fact that the child is in custody, the
alleged reasons for the custody, and the projected likely date for
the child's return home or placement for adoption or legal
guardianship. However, this investigation shall not be construed as
good cause for continuance of the dispositional hearing conducted
pursuant to Section 358.
(b) In any case in which more than one appropriate relative
requests preferential consideration pursuant to this section, each
relative shall be considered under the factors enumerated in
subdivision (a).
(c) For purposes of this section:
(1) "Preferential consideration" means that the relative seeking
placement shall be the first placement to be considered and
investigated.
(2) "Relative" means an adult who is related to the child by
blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth degree of kinship,
including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all relatives whose status
is preceded by the words "great," "great-great" or "grand" or the
spouse of any of these persons even if the marriage was terminated by
death or dissolution. However, only the following relatives shall be
given preferential consideration for the placement of the child: an
adult who is a grandparent, aunt, uncle, or sibling.
(d) Subsequent to the hearing conducted pursuant to Section 358,
whenever a new placement of the child must be made, consideration for
placement shall again be given as described in this section to
relatives who have not been found to be unsuitable and who will
fulfill the child's reunification or permanent plan requirements. In
addition to the factors described in subdivision (a), the county
social worker shall consider whether the relative has established and
maintained a relationship with the child.
(e) If the court does not place the child with a relative who has
been considered for placement pursuant to this section, the court
shall state for the record the reasons placement with that relative
was denied.
(f) (1) With respect to a child who satisfies the criteria set
forth in paragraph (2), the department and any licensed adoption
agency may search for a relative and furnish identifying information
relating to the child to that relative if it is believed the child's
welfare will be promoted thereby.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply if both of the following conditions
are satisfied:
(A) The child was previously a dependent of the court.
(B) The child was previously adopted and the adoption has been
disrupted, set aside pursuant to Section 9100 or 9102 of the Family
Code, or the child has been released into the custody of the
department or a licensed adoption agency by the adoptive parent or
parents.
(3) As used in this subdivision, "relative" includes a member of
the child's birth family and nonrelated extended family members,
regardless of whether the parental rights were terminated, provided
that both of the following are true:
(A) No appropriate potential caretaker is known to exist from the
child's adoptive family, including nonrelated extended family members
of the adoptive family.
(B) The child was not the subject of a voluntary relinquishment by
the birth parents pursuant to Section 8700 of the Family Code or
Section 1255.7 of the Health and Safety Code.

361.31. (a) In any case in which an Indian child is removed from
the physical custody of his or her parents or Indian custodian
pursuant to Section 361, the child's placement shall comply with this
section.
(b) Any foster care or guardianship placement of an Indian child,
or any emergency removal of a child who is known to be, or there is
reason to know that the child is, an Indian child shall be in the
least restrictive setting which most approximates a family situation
and in which the child's special needs, if any, may be met. The child
shall also be placed within reasonable proximity to the child's
home, taking into account any special needs of the child. Preference
shall be given to the child's placement with one of the following, in
descending priority order:
(1) A member of the child's extended family, as defined in Section
1903 of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.).
(2) A foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the child's
tribe.
(3) An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized
non-Indian licensing authority.
(4) An institution for children approved by an Indian tribe or
operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to
meet the Indian child's needs.
(c) In any adoptive placement of an Indian child, preference shall
be given to a placement with one of the following, in descending
priority order:
(1) A member of the child's extended family, as defined in Section
1903 of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.).
(2) Other members of the child's tribe.
(3) Another Indian family.
(d) Notwithstanding the placement preferences listed in
subdivisions (b) and (c), if a different order of placement
preference is established by the child's tribe, the court or agency
effecting the placement shall follow the order of preference
established by the tribe, so long as the placement is the least
restrictive setting appropriate to the particular needs of the child
as provided in subdivision (b).
(e) Where appropriate, the placement preference of the Indian
child, when of sufficient age, or parent shall be considered. In
applying the preferences, a consenting parent's request for anonymity
shall also be given weight by the court or agency effecting the
placement.
(f) The prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian
community in which the parent or extended family members of an Indian
child reside, or with which the parent or extended family members
maintain social and cultural ties, or the prevailing social and
cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe shall be applied in
meeting the placement preferences under this section. A determination
of the applicable prevailing social and cultural standards may be
confirmed by the Indian child's tribe or by the testimony or other
documented support of a qualified expert witness, as defined in
subdivision (c) of Section 224.6, who is knowledgeable regarding the
social and cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe.
(g) Any person or court involved in the placement of an Indian
child shall use the services of the Indian child's tribe, whenever
available through the tribe, in seeking to secure placement within
the order of placement preference established in this section and in
the supervision of the placement.
(h) The court may determine that good cause exists not to follow
placement preferences applicable under subdivision (b), (c), or (d)
in accordance with subdivision (e).
(i) When no preferred placement under subdivision (b), (c), or (d)
is available, active efforts shall be made to place the child with a
family committed to enabling the child to have extended family
visitation and participation in the cultural and ceremonial events of
the child's tribe.
(j) The burden of establishing the existence of good cause not to
follow placement preferences applicable under subdivision (b), (c),
or (d) shall be on the party requesting that the preferences not be
followed.
(k) A record of each foster care placement or adoptive placement
of an Indian child shall be maintained in perpetuity by the State
Department of Social Services. The record shall document the active
efforts to comply with the applicable order of preference specified
in this section.

361.4. (a) Prior to placing a child in the home of a relative, or
the home of any prospective guardian or other person who is not a
licensed or certified foster parent, the county social worker shall
visit the home to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement.
(b) Whenever a child may be placed in the home of a relative, or
the home of any prospective guardian or other person who is not a
licensed or certified foster parent, the court or county social
worker placing the child shall cause a state-level criminal records
check to be conducted by an appropriate government agency through the
California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS)
pursuant to Section 16504.5. The criminal records check shall be
conducted with regard to all persons over 18 years of age living in
the home, and on any other person over 18 years of age, other than
professionals providing professional services to the child, known to
the placing entity who may have significant contact with the child,
including any person who has a familial or intimate relationship with
any person living in the home. A criminal records check may be
conducted pursuant to this section on any person over 14 years of age
living in the home who the county social worker believes may have a
criminal record. Within 10 calendar days following the criminal
records check conducted through the California Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System, the social worker shall ensure that a
fingerprint clearance check of the relative and any other person
whose criminal record was obtained pursuant to this subdivision is
initiated through the Department of Justice to ensure the accuracy of
the criminal records check conducted through the California Law
Enforcement Telecommunications System and shall review the results of
any criminal records check to assess the safety of the home. The
Department of Justice shall forward fingerprint requests for
federal-level criminal history information to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation pursuant to this section.
(c) Whenever a child may be placed in the home of a relative, or a
prospective guardian or other person who is not a licensed or
certified foster parent, the county social worker shall cause a check
of the Child Abuse Central Index pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 11170 of the Penal Code to be requested from the Department
of Justice. The Child Abuse Central Index check shall be conducted on
all persons over 18 years of age living in the home. For any
application received on or after January 1, 2008, if any person in
the household is 18 years of age or older and has lived in another
state in the preceding five years, the county social worker shall
check the other state's child abuse and neglect registry to the
extent required by federal law.
(d) (1) If the results of the California and federal criminal
records check indicates that the person has no criminal record, the
county social worker and court may consider the home of the relative,
prospective guardian, or other person who is not a licensed or
certified foster parent for placement of a child.
(2) If the criminal records check indicates that the person has
been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot
grant an exemption for under Section 1522 of the Health and Safety
Code, the child shall not be placed in the home. If the criminal
records check indicates that the person has been convicted of a crime
that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for
under Section 1522 of the Health and Safety Code, the child shall not
be placed in the home unless a criminal records exemption has been
granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence
to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal
conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and
not present a risk of harm to the child pursuant to paragraph (3).
(3) (A) A county may issue a criminal records exemption only if
that county has been granted permission by the Director of Social
Services to issue criminal records exemptions. The county may file a
request with the Director of Social Services seeking permission for
the county to establish a procedure to evaluate and grant appropriate
individual criminal records exemptions for persons described in
subdivision (b). The director shall grant or deny the county's
request within 14 days of receipt. The county shall evaluate
individual criminal records in accordance with the standards and
limitations set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (g) of Section
1522 of the Health and Safety Code, and in no event shall the county
place a child in the home of a person who is ineligible for an
exemption under that provision.
(B) The department shall monitor county implementation of the
authority to grant an exemption under this paragraph to ensure that
the county evaluates individual criminal records and allows or
disallows placements according to the standards set forth in
paragraph (1) of subdivision (g) of Section 1522 of the Health and
Safety Code.
(4) The department shall conduct an evaluation of the
implementation of paragraph (3) through random sampling of county
exemption decisions.
(5) The State Department of Social Services shall not evaluate or
grant criminal records exemption requests for persons described in
subdivision (b), unless the exemption request is made by an Indian
tribe pursuant to subdivision (f).
(6) If a county has not requested, or has not been granted,
permission by the State Department of Social Services to establish a
procedure to evaluate and grant criminal records exemptions, the
county shall not place a child into the home of a person described in
subdivision (b) if any person residing in the home has been
convicted of a crime other than a minor traffic violation, except as
provided in subdivision (f).
(e) Nothing in this section shall preclude a county from
conducting a criminal background check that the county is otherwise
authorized to conduct using fingerprints.
(f) Upon request from an Indian tribe, the State Department of
Social Services shall evaluate an exemption request, if needed, to
allow placement into an Indian home that the tribe has designated for
placement under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et
seq.) that would otherwise be barred under this section. However, if
the county with jurisdiction over the child that is the subject of
the tribe's request has established an approved procedure pursuant to
paragraph (3) of subdivision (d), the tribe may request that the
county evaluate the exemption request. Once a tribe has elected to
have the exemption request reviewed by either the State Department of
Social Services or the county, the exemption decision may only be
made by that entity. Nothing in this subdivision limits the duty of a
county social worker to evaluate the home for placement or to gather
information needed to evaluate an exemption request.

361.45. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the
sudden unavailability of a foster caregiver requires a change in
placement on an emergency basis for a child who is under the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 300, if an
able and willing relative, as defined in Section 319, or an able and
willing nonrelative extended family member, as defined in Section
362.7, is available and requests temporary placement of the child
pending resolution of the emergency situation, the county welfare
department shall initiate an assessment of the relative's or
nonrelative extended family member's suitability, which shall include
an in-home inspection to assess the safety of the home and the
ability of the relative or nonrelative extended family member to care
for the child's needs, and a consideration of the results of a
criminal records check conducted pursuant to Section 16504.5 and a
check of allegations of prior child abuse or neglect concerning the
relative or nonrelative extended family member and other adults in
the home. Upon completion of this assessment, the child may be placed
in the assessed home. For purposes of this paragraph, and except for
the criminal records check conducted pursuant to Section 16504.5,
the standards used to determine suitability shall be the same
standards set forth in the regulations for the licensing of foster
family homes.
(b) Immediately following the placement of a child in the home of
a relative or a nonrelative extended family member, the county
welfare department shall evaluate and approve or deny the home for
purposes of AFDC-FC eligibility pursuant to Section 11402. The
standards used to evaluate and grant or deny approval of the home of
the relative and of the home of a nonrelative extended family member,
as described in Section 362.7, shall be the same standards set forth
in regulations for the licensing of foster family homes which
prescribe standards of safety and sanitation for the physical plant
and standards for basic personal care, supervision, and services
provided by the caregiver.
(c) If a relative or nonrelative extended family member, and other
adults in the home, as indicated, meets all other conditions for
approval, except for the receipt of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's criminal history information for the relative or
nonrelative extended family member, the county welfare department may
approve the home and document that approval, if the relative or
nonrelative extended family member, and each adult in the home, has
signed and submitted a statement that he or she has never been
convicted of a crime in the United States, other than a traffic
infraction as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
42001 of the Vehicle Code. If, after the approval has been granted,
the department determines that the relative or nonrelative extended
family member or other adult in the home has a criminal record, the
approval may be terminated.
(d) (1) On and after January 1, 2012, if a nonminor dependent, as
defined in subdivision (v) of Section 11400, is placed in the home of
a relative or nonrelative extended family member, the home shall be
approved using the same standards set forth in regulations as
described in Section 1502.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2) On or before July 1, 2012, the department, in consultation
with representatives of the Legislature, the County Welfare Directors
Association, the Chief Probation Officers of California, the
California Youth Connection, the Judicial Council, former foster
youth, child advocacy organizations, dependency counsel for children,
juvenile justice advocacy organizations, foster caregiver
organizations, labor organizations, and representatives of Indian
tribes, shall revise regulations regarding health and safety
standards for approving relative homes in which nonminor dependents,
as defined in subdivision (v) of Section 11400, of the juvenile court
are placed under the responsibility of the county welfare or
probation department, or an Indian tribe that entered into an
agreement pursuant to Section 10553.1.
(3) Notwithstanding the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5
(commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
the Government Code), the department, in consultation with the
stakeholders listed in paragraph (2), shall prepare for
implementation of the applicable provisions of this section by
publishing all-county letters or similar instructions from the
director by October 1, 2011, to be effective January 1, 2012.
Emergency regulations to implement this section may be adopted by the
director in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. The
initial adoption of the emergency regulations and one readoption of
the initial regulations shall be deemed to be an emergency and
necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health,
safety, or general welfare. Initial emergency regulations and the
first readoption of those emergency regulations shall be exempt from
review by the Office of Administrative Law. The emergency regulations
authorized by this section shall be submitted to the Office of
Administrative Law for filing with the Secretary of State and shall
remain in effect for no more than 180 days.

361.49. Regardless of his or her age, a child shall be deemed to
have entered foster care on the earlier of the date of the
jurisdictional hearing held pursuant to Section 356 or the date that
is 60 days after the date on which the child was initially removed
from the physical custody of his or her parent or guardian.

361.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), or when the
parent has voluntarily relinquished the child and the relinquishment
has been filed with the State Department of Social Services, or upon
the establishment of an order of guardianship pursuant to Section
360, whenever a child is removed from a parent's or guardian's
custody, the juvenile court shall order the social worker to provide
child welfare services to the child and the child's mother and
statutorily presumed father or guardians. Upon a finding and
declaration of paternity by the juvenile court or proof of a prior
declaration of paternity by any court of competent jurisdiction, the
juvenile court may order services for the child and the biological
father, if the court determines that the services will benefit the
child.
(1) Family reunification services, when provided, shall be
provided as follows:
(A) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (C), for a child
who, on the date of initial removal from the physical custody of his
or her parent or guardian, was three years of age or older,
court-ordered services shall be provided beginning with the
dispositional hearing and ending 12 months after the date the child
entered foster care as defined in Section 361.49, unless the child is
returned to the home of the parent or guardian.
(B) For a child who, on the date of initial removal from the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian, was under three
years of age, court-ordered services shall be provided for a period
of six months from the dispositional hearing as provided in
subdivision (e) of Section 366.21, but no longer than 12 months from
the date the child entered foster care as defined in Section 361.49
unless the child is returned to the home of the parent or guardian.
(C) For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home should reunification efforts fail, for a
child in a sibling group whose members were removed from parental
custody at the same time, and in which one member of the sibling
group was under three years of age on the date of initial removal
from the physical custody of his or her parent or guardian,
court-ordered services for some or all of the sibling group may be
limited as set forth in subparagraph (B). For the purposes of this
paragraph, "a sibling group" shall mean two or more children who are
related to each other as full or half siblings.
(2) Any motion to terminate court-ordered reunification services
prior to the hearing set pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section
366.21 for a child described by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), or
prior to the hearing set pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section
366.21 for a child described by subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph
(1), shall be made pursuant to the requirements set forth in
subdivision (c) of Section 388. A motion to terminate court-ordered
reunification services shall not be required at the hearing set
pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 366.21 if the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence one of the following:
(A) That the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown.
(B) That the parent has failed to contact and visit the child.
(C) That the parent has been convicted of a felony indicating
parental unfitness.
(3) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph
(1), court-ordered services may be extended up to a maximum time
period not to exceed 18 months after the date the child was
originally removed from physical custody of his or her parent or
guardian if it can be shown, at the hearing held pursuant to
subdivision (f) of Section 366.21, that the permanent plan for the
child is that he or she will be returned and safely maintained in the
home within the extended time period. The court shall extend the
time period only if it finds that there is a substantial probability
that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or guardian within the extended time period or that
reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian.
In determining whether court-ordered services may be extended, the
court shall consider the special circumstances of an incarcerated or
institutionalized parent or parents, or parent or parents
court-ordered to a residential substance abuse treatment program,
including, but not limited to, barriers to the parent's or guardian's
access to services and ability to maintain contact with his or her
child. The court shall also consider, among other factors, good faith
efforts that the parent or guardian has made to maintain contact
with the child. If the court extends the time period, the court shall
specify the factual basis for its conclusion that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian within the extended
time period. The court also shall make findings pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 366 and subdivision (e) of Section 358.1.
When counseling or other treatment services are ordered, the
parent or guardian shall be ordered to participate in those services,
unless the parent's or guardian's participation is deemed by the
court to be inappropriate or potentially detrimental to the child, or
unless a parent or guardian is incarcerated and the corrections
facility in which he or she is incarcerated does not provide access
to the treatment services ordered by the court. Physical custody of
the child by the parents or guardians during the applicable time
period under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) shall not
serve to interrupt the running of the period. If at the end of the
applicable time period, a child cannot be safely returned to the care
and custody of a parent or guardian without court supervision, but
the child clearly desires contact with the parent or guardian, the
court shall take the child's desire into account in devising a
permanency plan.
In cases where the child was under three years of age on the date
of the initial removal from the physical custody of his or her parent
or guardian or is a member of a sibling group as described in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1), the court shall inform the parent
or guardian that the failure of the parent or guardian to participate
regularly in any court-ordered treatment programs or to cooperate or
avail himself or herself of services provided as part of the child
welfare services case plan may result in a termination of efforts to
reunify the family after six months. The court shall inform the
parent or guardian of the factors used in subdivision (e) of Section
366.21 to determine whether to limit services to six months for some
or all members of a sibling group as described in subparagraph (C) of
paragraph (1).
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), court-ordered services may be
extended up to a maximum time period not to exceed 24 months after
the date the child was originally removed from physical custody of
his or her parent or guardian if it is shown, at the hearing held
pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, that the permanent
plan for the child is that he or she will be returned and safely
maintained in the home within the extended time period. The court
shall extend the time period only if it finds that it is in the child'
s best interest to have the time period extended and that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian who is described in
subdivision (b) of Section 366.22 within the extended time period,
or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or
guardian. If the court extends the time period, the court shall
specify the factual basis for its conclusion that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian within the extended
time period. The court also shall make findings pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 366 and subdivision (e) of Section 358.1.
When counseling or other treatment services are ordered, the
parent or guardian shall be ordered to participate in those services,
in order for substantial probability to be found. Physical custody
of the child by the parents or guardians during the applicable time
period under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) shall not
serve to interrupt the running of the period. If at the end of the
applicable time period, the child cannot be safely returned to the
care and custody of a parent or guardian without court supervision,
but the child clearly desires contact with the parent or guardian,
the court shall take the child's desire into account in devising a
permanency plan.
Except in cases where, pursuant to subdivision (b), the court does
not order reunification services, the court shall inform the parent
or parents of Section 366.26 and shall specify that the parent's or
parents' parental rights may be terminated.
(b) Reunification services need not be provided to a parent or
guardian described in this subdivision when the court finds, by clear
and convincing evidence, any of the following:
(1) That the whereabouts of the parent or guardian is unknown. A
finding pursuant to this paragraph shall be supported by an affidavit
or by proof that a reasonably diligent search has failed to locate
the parent or guardian. The posting or publication of notices is not
required in that search.
(2) That the parent or guardian is suffering from a mental
disability that is described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section
7820) of Part 4 of Division 12 of the Family Code and that renders
him or her incapable of utilizing those services.
(3) That the child or a sibling of the child has been previously
adjudicated a dependent pursuant to any subdivision of Section 300 as
a result of physical or sexual abuse, that following that
adjudication the child had been removed from the custody of his or
her parent or guardian pursuant to Section 361, that the child has
been returned to the custody of the parent or guardian from whom the
child had been taken originally, and that the child is being removed
pursuant to Section 361, due to additional physical or sexual abuse.
(4) That the parent or guardian of the child has caused the death
of another child through abuse or neglect.
(5) That the child was brought within the jurisdiction of the
court under subdivision (e) of Section 300 because of the conduct of
that parent or guardian.
(6) That the child has been adjudicated a dependent pursuant to
any subdivision of Section 300 as a result of severe sexual abuse or
the infliction of severe physical harm to the child, a sibling, or a
half sibling by a parent or guardian, as defined in this subdivision,
and the court makes a factual finding that it would not benefit the
child to pursue reunification services with the offending parent or
guardian.
A finding of severe sexual abuse, for the purposes of this
subdivision, may be based on, but is not limited to, sexual
intercourse, or stimulation involving genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal contact, whether between the parent or
guardian and the child or a sibling or half sibling of the child, or
between the child or a sibling or half sibling of the child and
another person or animal with the actual or implied consent of the
parent or guardian; or the penetration or manipulation of the child'
s, sibling's, or half sibling's genital organs or rectum by any
animate or inanimate object for the sexual gratification of the
parent or guardian, or for the sexual gratification of another person
with the actual or implied consent of the parent or guardian.
A finding of the infliction of severe physical harm, for the
purposes of this subdivision, may be based on, but is not limited to,
deliberate and serious injury inflicted to or on a child's body or
the body of a sibling or half sibling of the child by an act or
omission of the parent or guardian, or of another individual or
animal with the consent of the parent or guardian; deliberate and
torturous confinement of the child, sibling, or half sibling in a
closed space; or any other torturous act or omission that would be
reasonably understood to cause serious emotional damage.
(7) That the parent is not receiving reunification services for a
sibling or a half sibling of the child pursuant to paragraph (3),
(5), or (6).
(8) That the child was conceived by means of the commission of an
offense listed in Section 288 or 288.5 of the Penal Code, or by an
act committed outside of this state that, if committed in this state,
would constitute one of those offenses. This paragraph only applies
to the parent who committed the offense or act.
(9) That the child has been found to be a child described in
subdivision (g) of Section 300, that the parent or guardian of the
child willfully abandoned the child, and the court finds that the
abandonment itself constituted a serious danger to the child; or that
the parent or other person having custody of the child voluntarily
surrendered physical custody of the child pursuant to Section 1255.7
of the Health and Safety Code. For the purposes of this paragraph,
"serious danger" means that without the intervention of another
person or agency, the child would have sustained severe or permanent
disability, injury, illness, or death. For purposes of this
paragraph, "willful abandonment" shall not be construed as actions
taken in good faith by the parent without the intent of placing the
child in serious danger.
(10) That the court ordered termination of reunification services
for any siblings or half siblings of the child because the parent or
guardian failed to reunify with the sibling or half sibling after the
sibling or half sibling had been removed from that parent or
guardian pursuant to Section 361 and that parent or guardian is the
same parent or guardian described in subdivision (a) and that,
according to the findings of the court, this parent or guardian has
not subsequently made a reasonable effort to treat the problems that
led to removal of the sibling or half sibling of that child from that
parent or guardian.
(11) That the parental rights of a parent over any sibling or half