Sec. 16-50p. Certification proceeding decisions: Timing, opinion, factors considered. Telecommunications and community antenna television facilities: Additional factors considered, conditions. Modific - Connecticut Statutes

      Sec. 16-50p. Certification proceeding decisions: Timing, opinion, factors considered. Telecommunications and community antenna television facilities: Additional factors considered, conditions. Modification of location. Amendment proceeding decisions. Service and notice. "Public need" defined. (a)(1) In a certification proceeding, the council shall render a decision upon the record either granting or denying the application as filed, or granting it upon such terms, conditions, limitations or modifications of the construction or operation of the facility as the council may deem appropriate.

      (2) The council's decision shall be rendered in accordance with the following:

      (A) Not later than twelve months after the deadline for filing an application following the request for proposal process for a facility described in subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i or subdivision (4) of said subsection (a) if the application was incorporated in an application concerning a facility described in subdivision (1) of said subsection (a);

      (B) Not later than one hundred eighty days after the deadline for filing an application following the request for proposal process for a facility described in subdivision (4) of said subsection (a), and an application concerning a facility described in subdivision (3) of said subsection (a), provided such time periods may be extended by the council by not more than one hundred eighty days with the consent of the applicant; and

      (C) Not later than one hundred eighty days after the filing of an application for a facility described in subdivision (5) or (6) of said subsection (a), provided such time period may be extended by the council by not more than one hundred eighty days with the consent of the applicant.

      (3) The council shall file, with its order, an opinion stating in full its reasons for the decision. The council shall not grant a certificate, either as proposed or as modified by the council, unless it shall find and determine:

      (A) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, a public need for the facility and the basis of the need;

      (B) The nature of the probable environmental impact of the facility alone and cumulatively with other existing facilities, including a specification of every significant adverse effect, including, but not limited to, electromagnetic fields that, whether alone or cumulatively with other effects, on, and conflict with the policies of the state concerning, the natural environment, ecological balance, public health and safety, scenic, historic and recreational values, forests and parks, air and water purity and fish, aquaculture and wildlife;

      (C) Why the adverse effects or conflicts referred to in subparagraph (B) of this subdivision are not sufficient reason to deny the application;

      (D) In the case of an electric transmission line, (i) what part, if any, of the facility shall be located overhead, (ii) that the facility conforms to a long-range plan for expansion of the electric power grid of the electric systems serving the state and interconnected utility systems and will serve the interests of electric system economy and reliability, and (iii) that the overhead portions, if any, of the facility are cost effective and the most appropriate alternative based on a life-cycle cost analysis of the facility and underground alternatives to such facility, are consistent with the purposes of this chapter, with such regulations or standards as the council may adopt pursuant to section 16-50t, including, but limited to, the council's best management practices for electric and magnetic fields for electric transmission lines and with the Federal Power Commission "Guidelines for the Protection of Natural Historic Scenic and Recreational Values in the Design and Location of Rights-of-Way and Transmission Facilities" or any successor guidelines and any other applicable federal guidelines and are to be contained within an area that provides a buffer zone that protects the public health and safety, as determined by the council. In establishing such buffer zone, the council shall take into consideration, among other things, residential areas, private or public schools, licensed child day care facilities, licensed youth camps or public playgrounds adjacent to the proposed route of the overhead portions and the level of the voltage of the overhead portions and any existing overhead transmission lines on the proposed route. At a minimum, the existing right-of-way shall serve as the buffer zone;

      (E) In the case of an electric or fuel transmission line, that the location of the line will not pose an undue hazard to persons or property along the area traversed by the line;

      (F) In the case of an application that was heard under a consolidated hearing process with other applications that were common to a request for proposal, that the facility proposed in the subject application represents the most appropriate alternative among such applications based on the findings and determinations pursuant to this subsection; and

      (G) In the case of a facility described in subdivision (6) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i that is proposed to be installed on land under agricultural restriction, as provided in section 22-26cc, that the facility will not result in a material decrease of acreage and productivity of the arable land.

      (b) (1) Prior to granting an applicant's certificate for a facility described in subdivision (5) or (6) of section 16-50i, the council shall examine, in addition to its consideration of subdivisions (1) to (5), inclusive, of subsection (a) of this section: (A) The feasibility of requiring an applicant to share an existing facility, as defined in subsection (b) of section 16-50aa, within a technically derived search area of the site of the proposed facility, provided such shared use is technically, legally, environmentally and economically feasible and meets public safety concerns, (B) whether such facility, if constructed, may be shared with any public or private entity which provides telecommunications or community antenna television service to the public, provided such shared use is technically, legally, environmentally and economically feasible at fair market rates, meets public safety concerns, and the parties' interests have been considered and (C) whether the proposed facility would be located in an area of the state which the council, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection and any affected municipalities, finds to be a relatively undisturbed area that possesses scenic quality of local, regional or state-wide significance. The council may deny an application for a certificate if it determines that (i) shared use under the provisions of subparagraph (A) of this subdivision is feasible, (ii) the applicant would not cooperate relative to the future shared use of the proposed facility, or (iii) the proposed facility would substantially affect the scenic quality of its location and no public safety concerns require that the proposed facility be constructed in such a location.

      (2) When issuing a certificate for a facility described in subdivision (5) or (6) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i, the council may impose such reasonable conditions as it deems necessary to promote immediate and future shared use of such facilities and avoid the unnecessary proliferation of such facilities in the state. The council shall, prior to issuing a certificate, provide notice of the proposed facility to the municipality in which the facility is to be located. Upon motion of the council, written request by a public or private entity which provides telecommunications or community antenna television service to the public or upon written request by an interested party, the council may conduct a preliminary investigation to determine whether the holder of a certificate for such a facility is in compliance with the certificate. Following its investigation, the council may initiate a certificate review proceeding, which shall include a hearing, to determine whether the holder of a certificate for such a facility is in compliance with the certificate. In such proceeding, the council shall render a decision and may issue orders which it deems necessary to compel compliance with the certificate, which orders may include, but not be limited to, revocation of the certificate. Such orders may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of section 16-50u.

      (c) (1) The council shall not grant a certificate for a facility described in subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i, either as proposed or as modified by the council, unless it finds and determines a public benefit for the facility.

      (2) The council shall not grant a certificate for a facility described in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i which is substantially underground or underwater except where such facilities interconnect with existing overhead facilities, either as proposed or as modified by the council, unless it finds and determines a public benefit for the facility, in the case of such facility that is substantially underground, and a public need for such facility, in the case of such facility that is substantially underwater.

      (3) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of this subdivision, a public benefit exists if such a facility is necessary for the reliability of the electric power supply of the state or for the development of a competitive market for electricity and a public need exists if such facility is necessary for the reliability of the electric power supply of the state.

      (4) Any application for an electric transmission line with a capacity of three hundred forty-five kilovolts or more that is filed on or after May 1, 2003, and that proposes the underground burial of such line in all residential areas and overhead installation of such line in industrial and open space areas affected by such proposal shall have a rebuttable presumption of meeting a public benefit for such facility if the facility is substantially underground, and meeting a public need for such facility if the facility is substantially above ground. Such presumption may be overcome by evidence submitted by a party or intervenor to the satisfaction of the council.

      (d) If the council determines that the location of all or a part of the proposed facility should be modified, it may condition the certificate upon such modification, provided the municipalities, and persons residing or located in such municipalities, affected by the modification shall have had notice of the application as provided in subsection (b) of section 16-50l.

      (e) In an amendment proceeding, the council shall render a decision within ninety days of the filing of the application or adoption of the resolution initiating the proceeding. The council shall file an opinion with its order stating its reasons for the decision. The council's decision shall include the findings and determinations enumerated in subsection (a) of this section which are relevant to the proposed amendment.

      (f) A copy of the order and opinion issued therewith shall be served upon each party and a notice of the issuance of the order and opinion shall be published in such newspapers as will serve substantially to inform the public of the issuance of such order and opinion. The name and address of each party shall be set forth in the order.

      (g) In making its decision as to whether or not to issue a certificate, the council shall in no way be limited by the fact that the applicant may already have acquired land or an interest therein for the purpose of constructing the facility which is the subject of its application.

      (h) For purposes of this section, a public need exists for an energy facility if such facility is necessary for the reliability of the electric power supply of the state.

      (i) For a facility described in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i, with a capacity of three hundred forty-five kilovolts or greater, there shall be a presumption that a proposal to place the overhead portions, if any, of such facility adjacent to residential areas, private or public schools, licensed child day care facilities, licensed youth camps or public playgrounds is inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter. An applicant may rebut this presumption by demonstrating to the council that it will be technologically infeasible to bury the facility. In determining such infeasibility, the council shall consider the effect of burying the facility on the reliability of the electric transmission system of the state and whether the cost of any contemplated technology or design configuration may result in an unreasonable economic burden on the ratepayers of the state.

      (1971, P.A. 575, S. 10; P.A. 73-340, S. 1, 2; 73-458, S. 8; P.A. 75-375, S. 7, 12; P.A. 76-320, S. 1, 2; 76-359, S. 3, 7; P.A. 77-218, S. 4; P.A. 79-537, S. 4; P.A. 80-483, S. 66, 186; P.A. 83-569, S. 5, 17; P.A. 88-121, S. 1, 3; P.A. 93-268, S. 1; P.A. 94-176, S. 3; P.A. 98-28, S. 50, 117; P.A. 01-120, S. 2, 3; P.A. 03-140, S. 10-13; 03-221, S. 6; 03-248, S. 1; 03-263, S. 6; 03-278, S. 120; P.A. 04-236, S. 6, 7; 04-246, S. 3-7; P.A. 05-288, S. 219; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-4, S. 116.)

      History: P.A. 73-340 added Subsec. (d) re irrelevance of applicant's prior acquisition of land; P.A. 73-458 amended Subsec. (a) to clarify Subdiv. (2) by specifying "significant" adverse effects "whether alone or cumulatively ...", to add "that will provide, in accordance with the need for adequate and reliable electric service" in Subdiv. (4)(B) and to delete Subdiv. (6) re conformity of facility location to state and local laws; P.A. 75-375 amended Subsec. (a) to require decision within 10 months rather than one year, to delete reference in Subdiv. (4)(B) to elimination of overhead lines in accordance with need for adequate and reliable service and to require consistency with purposes of Ch. 277a and adopted regulations as well as with federal guidelines under Subdiv. (4)(C); P.A. 76-320 made technical change in Subsec. (b) and amended Subsec. (c) to require publication of notice of issuance of order and opinion rather than publication of copy of order and opinion; P.A. 76-359 rephrased Subsec. (d); P.A. 77-218 made 10-month deadline applicable to applications for facilities in Subdivs. (1) to (4), inclusive, of Sec. 16-50i(a), imposed 120-day deadline for those in Subdivs. (5) and (6) and made provision for extensions under Subsec. (a); P.A. 79-537 made clear that provisions apply to certification proceedings, inserted new Subsec. (c) re amendment proceedings and redesignated former Subsecs. (c) and (d) accordingly; P.A. 80-483 made technical changes; P.A. 83-569 amended Subsec. (a) to establish a time limit for council decisions affecting substations and switchyards; P.A. 88-121 amended Subsec. (a) increasing the council's time to render decisions on applications; P.A. 93-268 inserted new Subsec. (b) regarding factors considered in granting and conditions of a certificate for a facility described in Sec. 16-50i(a)(5) or (6), and relettered former Subsecs. (b) to (e) as (c) to (f); P.A. 94-176 amended Subsec. (a)(4)(C) by adding provision re life-cycle cost analysis of the facility and underground alternatives; P.A. 98-28 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), added new Subsec. (c) re siting of electric generating and storage facilities and electric transmission lines which are substantially underground or underwater, and redesignated former Subsecs. (c) to (f) as Subsecs. (d) to (g), effective July 1, 1998; P.A. 01-120 amended Subsec. (a) by adding aquaculture to items in Subdiv. (2) that council must determine the probable environmental impact upon for any facility and adding provisions making the terms of any agreement between the applicant and any party to the proceeding or third party part of the record of the proceeding, effective July 1, 2001; P.A. 03-140 amended Subsec. (a) to add provisions re feasible and prudent alternatives, effective July 1, 2003, and applicable to applications for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need filed after that date, and further amended said Subsec. to add subdiv. designators, to add "not later than" and "after the deadline for filing an application following the request-for-proposal process for" in Subdivs. (2)(A) and (2)(B), to delete reference to community antenna television and telecommunication towers in Subdiv. (2)(B), to add Subdiv. (2)(C) re deadline for issuing a decision on an application for community antenna television and telecommunication towers, to delete provisions re feasible and prudent alternatives, to add Subdiv. (3)(F) re applications heard under a consolidated hearing process, to delete provisions re terms of agreements as part of the record of the proceedings, and to make conforming changes, effective October 1, 2004, and amended Subsec. (c) to add provisions re public need for a facility that is substantially underwater in Subdiv. (2)(A), to add provisions re feasible and prudent alternatives, and to make technical changes, effective July 1, 2003, and applicable to applications for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need filed after that date, and further amended said subsec. to add Subdiv. (1)(D) re applications heard under a consolidated hearing process, to delete provisions re feasible and prudent alternatives, and to add Subdiv. (2)(F) re applications heard under a consolidated hearing process, effective October 1, 2004; P.A. 03-221 added Subsec. (a)(6) re telecommunication towers proposed on land under agricultural restriction; P.A. 03-248 added Subsec. (c)(3) re rebuttable resumption for an application for certain electric transmission lines, effective July 9, 2003; P.A. 03-263 added new Subsec. (h) re definition of public need for an energy facility, effective July 9, 2003; P.A. 03-278 amended Subsec. (a) by adding Subdiv. (6) re facility proposed to be installed on land under agricultural restriction; P.A. 04-236 made a technical change in former version of Subsecs. (a)(4)(C) and (c)(2)(B), effective June 8, 2004; P.A. 04-246 amended Subsec. (a) to make technical changes, to add "including, but not limited to, electromagnetic fields that," to include references to standards and best management practices for electric and magnetic fields for electric transmission lines, and to add buffer zone requirement, amended Subsec. (c) to make technical changes and to eliminate provisions re rebuttable presumption for certain electric transmission line applications, and added Subsec. (i) re presumption re proposal for an overhead electric transmission facility with a capacity of three hundred forty-five kilovolts or greater, effective June 3, 2004, and applicable to applications for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need that was originally filed on or after October 1, 2003, for which the Connecticut Siting Council has not rendered a decision upon the record prior to June 3, 2004 (Revisor's note: In 2005, the Revisors editorially redesignated Subsec. (c)(3) as Subsec. (c)(4) to conform with technical changes made by P.A. 04-246); P.A. 05-288 made technical changes in Subsec. (a)(3)(A) and (D), effective July 13, 2005; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-4 amended Subsec. (i) to add to factors for determining infeasibility whether cost of any contemplated technology or design configuration may result in unreasonable economic burden for ratepayers, effective July 1, 2007.

      See Sec. 16a-7c re the request-for-proposal process.

      Cited. 212 C. 157. Cited. 215 C. 474. In determining environmental impact, council's jurisdiction is limited to nonnuclear environmental effects. 286 C. 57.

      Cited. 20 CA 474.

      Subsec. (c):

      Cited. 177 C. 623.

      Subsec. (g):

      The phrase "in no way be limited" implies that legislature did not want the council to be bound by an applicant's alleged acquisition of an interest in land, but council was not prohibited from considering such an interest in determining whether the certificate should be issued. The language is an enlargement of the council's discretion, not a limitation, permitting but not obligating the council to consider likelihood of applicant securing the proposed site. 50 CS 443.