CONNECTICUT STATUTES AND CODES
               		Sec. 16-236. Appraisal of damages; costs.
               		
               		
               	 	
               	 	               	 	
               	 	
               	 	
               	 		
      Sec. 16-236. Appraisal of damages; costs. Any judge of the Superior Court may, 
upon the application of any party interested, and after notice, unless the application 
has been unreasonably delayed, appoint three disinterested persons to make a written 
appraisal of all damages due any person by reason of anything done under any provision 
of section 16-228 or 16-234 or which is in violation of any order made under section 
16-235. Such appraisal, when approved by such judge, shall be returned to and recorded 
by the clerk of the superior court for the judicial district where the cause of action arose, 
and thereupon the sum specified therein shall be paid immediately by the company to 
the party entitled to the same, or the judge may order the same to be paid immediately 
into the hands of such clerk, to be delivered by him on demand to such party. The costs 
of such proceedings shall be taxed by such judge and paid by such company, and he 
may issue execution therefor and for such damages.
      (1949 Rev., S. 5647; 1963, P.A. 349; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127.)
      History: 1963 act added "violations of orders under" Sec. 16-235 to first sentence; P.A. 78-280 substituted "judicial 
district" for "county".
      Section valid; taking of land is not for private purpose. 90 C. 179; 92 C. 635. Cited. 149 C. 100. Legislative history. 
Id., 102. Indicates legislative intent to depart from strict eminent domain principles as basis for damages and to provide 
for payment, to any party interested, of damages for anything done under or by authority of section 16-235. Id., 104. Claim 
that plaintiff asking for damages under this section is required first to appeal to public utilities commission from the granting 
of the permit is without merit. 152 C. 690. Claim that phrase "anything done" under section 16-235 is restricted to case 
where there has been a physical invasion of plaintiff's property is without merit. Id. Whether plaintiff's application has 
been "unreasonably delayed" is an issue of fact, dependent upon the surrounding circumstances. Id., 691.
               	 	
               	 	
               	 	               	 	
               	 	               	 	               	  
               	 
               	 
               	 
               	 
            Connecticut Forms by Issue
      			
               	 			               	 		
               	 		
               	 		               	 		Connecticut Law
               	 		
      				            			Connecticut State Laws
            			            			
            			            			
            			            			
            			            			Connecticut Court
            			            			
            			            			Connecticut Agencies