CONNECTICUT STATUTES AND CODES
Sec. 51-217. Qualification of jurors.
Sec. 51-217. Qualification of jurors. (a) All jurors shall be electors, or citizens
of the United States who are residents of this state having a permanent place of abode
in this state and appear on the list compiled by the Jury Administrator under subsection
(b) of section 51-222a, who have reached the age of eighteen. A person shall be disqualified to serve as a juror if such person (1) is found by a judge of the Superior Court to
exhibit any quality which will impair the capacity of such person to serve as a juror,
except that no person shall be disqualified on the basis of deafness or hearing impairment;
(2) has been convicted of a felony within the past seven years or is a defendant in a
pending felony case or is in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction; (3) is not
able to speak and understand the English language; (4) is the Governor, Lieutenant
Governor, Secretary of the State, Treasurer, Comptroller or Attorney General; (5) is a
judge of the Probate Court, Superior Court, Appellate Court or Supreme Court, is a
family support magistrate or is a federal court judge; (6) is a member of the General
Assembly, provided such disqualification shall apply only while the General Assembly
is in session; (7) is seventy years of age or older and chooses not to perform juror service;
or (8) is incapable, by reason of a physical or mental disability, of rendering satisfactory
juror service. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (8) of this subsection must submit to the Jury Administrator a letter from a licensed physician stating
the physician's opinion that such disability prevents the person from rendering satisfactory juror service. In reaching such opinion, the physician shall apply the following
guideline: A person shall be capable of rendering satisfactory juror service if such person
is able to perform a sedentary job requiring close attention for six hours per day, with
short work breaks in the morning and afternoon sessions, for at least three consecutive
business days.
(b) The Jury Administrator may determine, in such manner and at such times as the
Jury Administrator deems feasible, whether any person is qualified to serve as juror
under this section and whether any person may be excused for extreme hardship.
(c) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to establish and maintain a list
of persons to be excluded from the summoning process, which shall consist of (1) persons
who are disqualified from serving on jury duty on a permanent basis due to a disability
for which a licensed physician has submitted a letter stating the physician's opinion that
such disability permanently prevents the person from rendering satisfactory jury service,
(2) persons seventy years of age or older who have requested not to be summoned, (3)
elected officials enumerated in subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of this section and
judges enumerated in subdivision (5) of subsection (a) of this section during their term
of office, and (4) persons excused from jury service pursuant to section 51-217a who
have not requested to be summoned for jury service pursuant to said section. Persons
requesting to be excluded pursuant to subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection must
provide the Jury Administrator with their names, addresses, dates of birth and federal
Social Security numbers for use in matching. The request to be excluded may be rescinded at any time with written notice to the Jury Administrator.
(1949 Rev., S. 7906; 1963, P.A. 629; P.A. 76-52, S. 3, 8; P.A. 82-11, S. 1, 12; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, S. 1, 18; P.A.
84-393, S. 1, 18, 20; P.A. 85-271, S. 1, 5; P.A. 86-278, S. 1, 12; 86-403, S. 101, 132; P.A. 87-22, S. 1, 2; P.A. 88-87; P.A.
94-169, S. 4, 20; P.A. 96-179, S. 1; P.A. 97-200, S. 3; P.A. 98-219, S. 18; P.A. 00-116, S. 1, 7; P.A. 01-195, S. 55, 181;
P.A. 08-103, S. 2.)
History: 1963 act deleted requirement electors be not less than 25 years of age; P.A. 76-52 deleted requirement that
jurors be "esteemed in their community as persons of good character, approved integrity, sound judgment and fair education"
and required that jurors be at least 18 years old, effective September 1, 1977; P.A. 82-11 added licensed motor vehicle
operators who are state residents and U.S. citizens as persons qualified to serve as jurors, applicable to summoning of
jurors for jury duty on or after September 1, 1983; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, effective July 1, 1985, and applicable to
summoning of jurors for jury duty on and after September 1, 1986, deleted provision re permanent disability impairing
capacity to serve as juror and added provision re disqualification to serve as juror; P.A. 84-393 repealed amendments
enacted by June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5 and amended section by providing that Subsec. (a) shall apply to jurors selected and
summoned to serve on or before August 31, 1986, and added Subsec. (b) re qualifications and grounds for disqualification
of jurors selected and summoned to serve on or after September 1, 1986; P.A. 85-271 added definition of "permanent
disability" in Subsec. (a) and exception prohibiting disqualification on basis of deafness or hearing impairment in Subsec.
(b), effective February 1, 1986; P.A. 86-278 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision re determination of qualification
and excuse for hardship by jury administrator, and added Subsec. (c) re qualifications of jurors selected and summoned
to serve on or after September 1, 1987; P.A. 86-403 made technical change in Subsec. (b); P.A. 87-22 amended Subsecs.
(a) and (c) by adding governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of the state, treasurer, comptroller and attorney general to
list of persons disqualified to serve as jurors; P.A. 88-87 amended Subsec. (c)(1) by adding disqualification re service as
juror for judge of the superior court, appellate court or supreme court or federal court judge; P.A. 94-169 eliminated obsolete
provisions and made technical changes, effective July 1, 1994; (Revisor's note: In 1997 a reference in Subsec. (a) to "Motor
Vehicle Department" was replaced editorially by the Revisors with "Department of Motor Vehicles" for consistency with
customary statutory usage); P.A. 96-179 amended Subsec. (a) by adding phrase "having a permanent place of abode in
this state" and added provision re appearance on list compiled by Jury Administrator under Sec. 51-222a(b) after September
1, 1997; P.A. 97-200 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting reference to records of Department of Motor Vehicles re lists of
persons holding motor vehicle operator's licenses, by adding family support magistrates in Subdiv. (5) and by deleting
provision re nature of the disability; P.A. 98-219 amended Subsec. (a)(5) by adding judge of the Probate Court; P.A. 00-116 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (b) and added Subsec. (c) re authority of Jury Administrator to establish
and maintain list of persons to be excluded from summoning process, effective September 1, 2000; P.A. 01-195 made
technical changes in Subsec. (c), effective July 11, 2001; P.A. 08-103 inserted Subsec. (c)(4) re persons excused pursuant
to Sec. 51-217a who have not requested to be summoned.
See Sec. 1-25 re forms of oaths for jurors.
See Sec. 51-245 re duties of jurors, generally.
Challenge for not being an elector. 13 C. 453. A challenge to the array must be for a cause that affects all the jurors
alike. 67 C. 583; 109 C. 572. There can rarely be any ground for a challenge to the array; 48 C. 546; nature of such challenge.
67 C. 581. Jurors are not public officers within the meaning of the constitution and law. 48 C. 546. Prescribed age not
indispensable to the validity of a verdict. 72 C. 112. Grounds for challenge at common law are still good. 103 C. 542.
Statutory qualifications are in addition to those at common law. Id. Reading newspaper articles to jury in jury room not
ground for challenge to array, since it is not concerned with any irregularity in selecting or summoning jurors composing
panel. 109 C. 572. Proper remedy where papers or exhibits are improperly sent into jury room is motion to set aside verdict;
and motion to set aside should be granted unless it clearly appears that they had no prejudicial effect; whether jury made
use of such papers is immaterial, since deliberations cannot be inquired into. Id., 726. An array representation of the
community is a fair cross section of the county. A challenge to the array is inadequate where it was not an attack on the
selection process for the entire panel. 167 C. 539. Held constitutional on its face. Exclusion of felons consistent with
standards of section. 169 C. 692. Legislatively prescribed juror qualifications do not unconstitutionally encroach upon the
judicial power. 180 C. 382. General discussion of relevant procedure for jury selection in Connecticut. 254 C. 578.
Cited. 7 CA 95.
Cited. 38 CS 407.
Underrepresentation of a racial group on juries is not violative of any constitutional requirements. Constitution requires
only a fair jury selected without regard to race. Connecticut's system of selecting jurors does not, in and of itself, discriminate
against Negroes. Statutes are designed to produce jurors who reasonably reflect a cross section of the community and are
of necessary character and intelligence. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 203-205.
Subsec. (a):
Cited. 203 C. 570. Subdiv. (3): English proficiency requirement not violative of equal protection clause of either federal
or state constitution. 260 C. 339.
Subsec. (c):
Subdiv. (1) cited. 216 C. 621. Subdiv. (2) cited. 220 C. 487.
Subdiv. (1) cited. 42 CS 534.