CONNECTICUT STATUTES AND CODES
               		Sec. 53a-7. Effect of intoxication.
               		
               		
               	 	
               	 	               	 	
               	 	
               	 	
               	 		
      Sec. 53a-7. Effect of intoxication. Intoxication shall not be a defense to a criminal 
charge, but in any prosecution for an offense evidence of intoxication of the defendant 
may be offered by the defendant whenever it is relevant to negate an element of the 
crime charged, provided when recklessness or criminal negligence is an element of the 
crime charged, if the actor, due to self-induced intoxication, is unaware of or disregards 
or fails to perceive a risk which he would have been aware of had he not been intoxicated, 
such unawareness, disregard or failure to perceive shall be immaterial. As used in this 
section, "intoxication" means a substantial disturbance of mental or physical capacities 
resulting from the introduction of substances into the body.
      (1969, P.A. 828, S. 7.)
      See annotations to chapter 952, part V (former section 53-17).
      Cited. 172 C. 65. Cited. 173 C. 35. Cited 176 C. 224. Cited. 178 C. 480. A defendant is entitled, as matter of law, to a 
theory of defense instruction when evidence under this section is before jury. Id., 704. Cited. 184 C. 121. Cited. 185 C. 
63. Cited. 186 C. 414. Cited. 189 C. 611. Cited. 193 C. 632. Cited. 196 C. 341. Cited. 198 C. 560; Id., 644. Cited. 199 C. 
102. Cited. 201 C. 190. Cited. 204 C. 240. Cited. 209 C. 75. Cited. 210 C. 481. Cited. 212 C. 195. Cited. 217 C. 648. Cited. 
223 C. 41; Id., 273. Cited. 234 C. 139.
      Cited. 1 CA 260. Cited. 6 CA 701. Cited. 10 CA 643. Cited. 11 CA 122. Cited. 16 CA 358. Cited. 22 CA 521. Cited. 
23 CA 315; Id., 502. Cited. 24 CA 678. Cited. 25 CA 456. Cited. 27 CA 73. Cited. 35 CA 699. Cited. 37 CA 404. Cited. 
41 CA 361. Cited. 44 CA 818. Application of section. 51 CA 345. Trial court did not improperly exclude proffered evidence 
re defendant's claim of intoxication at time of murder. 91 CA 169. While intoxication is neither a defense nor an affirmative 
defense to a murder charge, evidence of defendant's intoxication is relevant to negate specific intent which is an essential 
element of crime of murder; however, intoxication does not automatically negate intent. 95 CA 263.
               	 	
               	 	
               	 	               	 	
               	 	               	 	               	  
               	 
               	 
               	 
               	 
            Connecticut Forms by Issue
      			
               	 			               	 		
               	 		
               	 		               	 		Connecticut Law
               	 		
      				            			Connecticut State Laws
            			            			
            			            			
            			            			
            			            			Connecticut Court
            			            			
            			            			Connecticut Agencies