GEORGIA STATUTES AND CODES
               		§ 48-8-243 - Criteria for development of investment list of projects and programs; report; gridlock
               		
               		
               	 	
               	 	               	 	
               	 	
               	 	
               	 		
O.C.G.A.    48-8-243   (2010)
   48-8-243.    Criteria for development of investment list of projects and programs; report; gridlock 
      (a)  Within  60 calendar days following approval by the Governor of the state-wide  strategic transportation plan, the State Transportation Board shall  consider the state-wide strategic transportation plan in accordance with  the provisions of subsection (c) of Code Section 32-2-22. Upon approval  of the state-wide strategic transportation plan by the State  Transportation Board, the director shall provide in written form to the  local governments and any MPO's within each special district across the  state recommended criteria for the development of an investment list of  projects and programs. The establishment of such criteria shall comport  with the investment policies provided in subsection (a) of Code Section  32-2-41.1 and the state-wide strategic transportation plan. The  recommended criteria shall include performance goals, allocation of  investments in alignment with performance, and execution of projects.  The state fiscal economist shall develop an estimate of the proceeds of  the special district transportation sales and use tax for each special  district using financial data supplied by the department. Such estimate  shall include reasonable ranges of anticipated growth, if any. The  director shall include such estimates and ranges in the recommended  criteria for developing the draft investment list. Any local government  or MPO desiring to submit comments on the recommended criteria shall  make such submission to the director no later than September 30, 2010.  On or before November 10, 2010, the mayors in each county shall elect  the mayoral representative to the regional transportation roundtable and  notify the county commission chairperson and the director of that  mayor's name. The director shall accept comments from any MPO located  wholly or partially within each special district in finalizing the  recommended district criteria in a written report on or before November  15, 2010. Such report shall also include notice of the date, time, and  location of the first regional transportation roundtable for each  special district for the purpose of considering the recommended district  criteria and for electing members of the executive committee for each  special district. Any amendment to the recommended criteria, approval of  such criteria, and election of the executive committee shall be enacted  by a majority vote of the representatives present at the roundtable  meeting. Upon approval of the criteria, the director shall promptly  deliver a report to the commissioner of transportation, local  governments, any MPO located wholly or partially within each special  district and the members of the General Assembly whose districts lie  wholly or partially within each special district detailing the criteria  approved by the roundtable.
(b)  With regard  to any area of a special district that is not part of an MPO, following  receipt of the report provided for in subsection (a) of this Code  section, and after receiving comments, if any, from members of the  General Assembly whose districts lie wholly or partially within such  area, the local governments in such area may submit projects to the  director to assemble a list of example investments for such special  district that comport with the special district's investment criteria.  With regard to any area of a special district that is part of an MPO,  following receipt of the report provided for in subsection (a) of this  Code section, and after receiving comments, if any, from members of the  General Assembly whose districts lie wholly or partially within such  area, the local governments may submit projects to the director and to  the MPO for the director to use to assemble a list of example  investments for such special district that comport with the special  district's investment criteria. The list of example investments for each  special district shall not be required to be fiscally constrained  within the budget of the revenues projected to be generated by each  special district's sales and use tax and shall be submitted to the  executive committee for each regional transportation roundtable for  consideration. The executive committee in collaboration with the  director shall choose from the list of example investments to create the  draft investment list, which shall be approved by majority vote of the  executive committee. Such draft investment list shall be fiscally  constrained within the ranges of revenues projected to be generated by  the special district sales and use tax, as determined by the state  fiscal economist. The special district's draft investment list as  approved by the executive committee shall be considered by the regional  transportation roundtable. The director shall deliver the draft  investment list to the local governments, MPO's, and members of the  General Assembly whose districts lie wholly or partially within each  special district for each special district not later than August 15,  2011. The director shall include in the draft investment list a  statement of the specific public benefits to be expected upon the  completion of each project on the investment list and how the special  district's investment criteria are furthered by each project. Examples  of specific public benefits include, but are not limited to, congestion  mitigation, increased lane capacity, public safety, and economic  development. The director shall include in such delivery notice of the  date, time, and location of each district's executive committee meeting  and final regional transportation roundtable. Prior to holding the final  regional transportation roundtable, the executive committee shall hold,  after proper notice to the public, at least two public meetings in the  region for the purpose of receiving public comment on the draft regional  investment list. The executive committee shall prepare and deliver to  all members of the regional roundtable and the director a summary of the  public comment on the regional investment list. The local governments,  MPO's, and members of the General Assembly whose districts lie wholly or  partially within such special district may submit comments on the draft  investment list addressed to both the director and the executive  committee no later than two weeks prior to the dates of the final  regional transportation roundtable and the executive committee meeting,  respectively, for the special district. At the final regional  transportation roundtable, the draft investment list approved by the  executive committee shall be considered for approval by a majority vote  of the representatives present at the roundtable. Should the roundtable  reject the draft investment list approved by the executive committee,  the roundtable then may negotiate amendments that meet the district's  investment criteria to the draft investment list, which shall be chosen  from the list of example investments for each special district, each  voted on separately and requiring a majority vote of the representatives  present at the roundtable for approval. Upon consideration of all  offered amendments, upon motion, the roundtable shall vote as to the  approval of the amended draft list, requiring a majority vote of the  representatives present at the roundtable. The approved investment list,  if any, shall be provided to the director. On or before October 15,  2011, the director shall deliver such list to the commission, the  commissioner of transportation, the executive director of the Georgia  Regional Transportation Authority, local governments, MPO's, and members  of the General Assembly whose districts lie wholly or partially within  each special district for each special district. The approved investment  list shall include:
      (1)  The specific transportation projects to be funded;
      (2)  The anticipated schedule of such projects;
      (3)  The approximate cost of such projects; and
      (4)  The  estimated amount of net proceeds to be raised by the tax including the  amount of proceeds to be distributed to local governments pursuant to  subsection (e) of Code Section 48-8-249.
If  a roundtable does not approve the original draft investment list or an  amended draft investment list on or before October 15, 2011, then a  special district gridlock shall be declared by the director and no  election shall be held in such special district. The question of levying  the tax shall not be submitted to the voters of the special district  until after 24 months immediately following the month in which the  special district gridlock was reached.
(c)  In  the event a special district gridlock is declared, the local  governments in such special district shall be required to provide a 50  percent match for any local maintenance and improvement grants by the  Department of Transportation. Such 50 percent match requirement shall  remain in place until the special district roundtable approves an  investment list meeting the special district's investment criteria and  an election is held within the special district on the levy of the  special district transportation sales and use tax.