STATE STATUTES & CODES
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
UTAH STATUTES AND CODES
26-8a-416 - Transition to eliminate inconsistent licenses.
26-8a-416. Transition to eliminate inconsistent licenses.
(1) By May 30, 2000, the department shall review all licenses in effect on October 2,1999, to identify overlap, as defined in department rule, in the service areas of two or morelicensed providers.
(2) By June 30, 2000, the department shall notify all licensed providers affected by anoverlap. By September 30, 2000, the department shall schedule, by order, a deadline to resolveeach overlap, considering the effects on the licensed providers and the areas to be addressed.
(3) For each overlap, the department shall meet with the affected licensed providers andprovide 120 days for a negotiated resolution, consistent with the criteria in Section 26-8a-408.
(4) (a) If a resolution is reached under Subsection (2) that the department finds satisfiesthe criteria in Section 26-8a-408, the department shall amend the licenses to reflect the resolutionconsistent with Subsection (6).
(b) If a resolution is not reached under Subsection (2), the department or any of thelicensed providers involved in the matter may request the commencement of a formal adjudicativeproceeding to resolve the overlap.
(5) The department shall commence adjudicative proceedings for any overlap that is notresolved by July 1, 2003.
(6) Notwithstanding the exclusive geographic service requirement of Section 26-8a-402,the department may amend one or more licenses after a resolution is reached or an adjudicativeproceeding has been held to allow:
(a) a single licensed provider to serve all or part of the overlap area;
(b) more than one licensed provider to serve the overlap area;
(c) licensed providers to provide different types of service in the overlap area; or
(d) licenses that recognize service arrangements that existed on September 30, 1999.
(7) Notwithstanding Subsection (6), any license for an overlap area terminates upon:
(a) relinquishment by the provider; or
(b) revocation by the department.
(1) By May 30, 2000, the department shall review all licenses in effect on October 2,1999, to identify overlap, as defined in department rule, in the service areas of two or morelicensed providers.
(2) By June 30, 2000, the department shall notify all licensed providers affected by anoverlap. By September 30, 2000, the department shall schedule, by order, a deadline to resolveeach overlap, considering the effects on the licensed providers and the areas to be addressed.
(3) For each overlap, the department shall meet with the affected licensed providers andprovide 120 days for a negotiated resolution, consistent with the criteria in Section 26-8a-408.
(4) (a) If a resolution is reached under Subsection (2) that the department finds satisfiesthe criteria in Section 26-8a-408, the department shall amend the licenses to reflect the resolutionconsistent with Subsection (6).
(b) If a resolution is not reached under Subsection (2), the department or any of thelicensed providers involved in the matter may request the commencement of a formal adjudicativeproceeding to resolve the overlap.
(5) The department shall commence adjudicative proceedings for any overlap that is notresolved by July 1, 2003.
(6) Notwithstanding the exclusive geographic service requirement of Section 26-8a-402,the department may amend one or more licenses after a resolution is reached or an adjudicativeproceeding has been held to allow:
(a) a single licensed provider to serve all or part of the overlap area;
(b) more than one licensed provider to serve the overlap area;
(c) licensed providers to provide different types of service in the overlap area; or
(d) licenses that recognize service arrangements that existed on September 30, 1999.
(7) Notwithstanding Subsection (6), any license for an overlap area terminates upon:
(a) relinquishment by the provider; or
(b) revocation by the department.
Enacted by Chapter 141, 1999 General Session
Utah Forms by Issue
Utah Court Forms
Utah Law
Utah Court Map
Tips